Category: NFL

  • You can win with Jalen Hurts if you put his talent to use

    By BRYCE ROSSLER

    It’s going to happen. It remains to be seen who. But on Thursday night, some NFL GM is going to invest a first-round pick in a flawed quarterback. 

    Usually, it’s some wild-eyed, strong-armed archetype who lacks a command of both ball placement and the nuances of the position. These players are full of untapped potential according to the evaluators who are full of excuses as to why ‘their guy’ never produced in college. Teams seem willing to bank on development of traits that have typically proven to be difficult to iron out, and have been equally unwilling to take chances on talented, albeit productive college players whose usage at the amateur level does not resemble that of the traditional NFL passer. 

    Oklahoma’s Jalen Hurts is one such player whose unique skill set will give him an opportunity to succeed in the NFL, but it will take the right set of circumstances to maximize his talents. Hurts appears unlikely to go in the first round and it is difficult to envision an organization immediately building around a quarterback who is not a top pick, but it is not difficult to see the value he can bring to a team.

    Designed Quarterback Runs and RPOs

    If a team wants to win with Hurts as a starter, it will need to optimize his talents as a runner. This is not to say that he’s a glorified wildcat quarterback or that he can’t win throwing. There is no honor in winning exclusively as a dropback passer. Some teams have found considerable success employing their quarterback as a designed runner. Lamar Jackson, Cam Newton, and pre-injury Robert Griffin III all come to mind as legitimate dual threats who were used extensively and to great effect in the run game.

    In 2019, we saw Oklahoma coach Lincoln Riley maximize Hurts’ vision, elusiveness, and power to the tune of 0.26 EPA/Carry on designed runs, which ranked 5th among QBs with at least 50 attempts. Although the Sooners had a diverse option game that featured the traditional zone read, power read, bash, GT read, and Riley’s patent-pending counter speed option, Hurts also had his number called on QB Power, QB Counter, QB Draw, and QB Lead. Some of these concepts were married to the Run Pass Option (RPO) game, another area that Hurts thrived in.

    16% of Oklahoma’s offensive snaps featured some sort of RPO element in 2019. The Sooners ranked third in the country in RPO success rate (58%), thanks in part to Hurts’ pre-snap identification of numbers and leverage advantages and post-snap decisionmaking.

    Intermediate and Deep Passing

    Hurts did some of his best work as a passer when addressing the intermediate areas of the field. He ranked first in Total Points/Attempt (0.77) on throws between 10 and 19 yards downfield among 94 quarterbacks with at least 50 such attempts. For reference, Trevor Lawrence was second while averaging 0.74 on just five more attempts (78). Furthermore, Hurts’ on-target rate of 95% was second-best in the country when targeting seams, digs, and crossers in this sweet spot (minimum 15 attempts). 

    Some NFL quarterbacks have made a living on these kinds of throws. For example, Jared Goff (64) and Tom Brady (56) had the first- and second-most attempts on these throws in the 2018 season when their teams met in the Super Bowl. Hurts was also more than competent at attacking downfield. His on-target rate of 67% on his 54 throws at least 20 yards downfield was good for seventh-best among 128 eligible QBs (minimum 25 attempts). He ranked fifth among that same group in pComp+/- with +12% (this stat measures a quarterback’s completion percentage compared to his expected completion percentage).

    Last Word

    Hurts’ path to success as an NFL starter will depend on organizational fit and schematic flexibility from the coaching staff. 

    In my estimation, this would be a team that 

    1) is willing to leverage its quarterback in the run game

    2) is comfortable incorporating RPO concepts into their quick game

    3) carries several staple plays which target the intermediate areas of the field 

    4) has a penchant for shot plays, particularly off play action

    Coach Riley was willing and able to do all these things for Hurts and it worked well most of the time. NFL offenses are a far cry from the offenses seen in the Big 12, though, and it remains to be seen whether Hurts will land with the right team. If all the stars align, he could end up being a steal for a team, regardless of when he is drafted.

  • 2020 SIS Video Scouts Mock Draft

    Organized By NATE COOPER & JOHN TODD

    Surprise! The Cincinnati Bengals select Joe Burrow No. 1.

    Where are the top quarterbacks going to fall? Who are the Dolphins going to take with their three first-round picks? How many wide receivers get drafted in this ridiculously deep class and where do they all go?

    Using traditional scouting and analytics in conjunction with the SIS Football Rookie Handbook, members of the Sports Info Solutions Operations department tried their hand at attempting to answer all of these questions and more in a full 7-Round Mock Draft.

    Where are your favorite players going to land?

    Who is your favorite team going to select?

    Those questions are are about to be answered. Find out now!

    Round 1
    Pick Team Scout Player College
    1 Bengals John QB Joe Burrow LSU
    2 Redskins John EDGE Chase Young Ohio State
    3 Lions Nathan CB Jeff Okudah Ohio State
    4 Giants John OT Andrew Thomas Georgia
    5 Dolphins Evan QB Tua Tagovailoa Alabama
    6 Chargers Nathan QB Justin Herbert Oregon
    7 Panthers Jordan LB Isaiah Simmons Clemson
    8 Cardinals Justin OT Tristan Wirfs Iowa
    9 Jaguars Nathan DT Derrick Brown Auburn
    10 Browns John OT Jedrick Wills Alabama
    11 Jets Stephen WR CeeDee Lamb Oklahoma
    12 Raiders Ben WR Jerry Jeudy Alabama
    13 49ers Justin WR Henry Ruggs III Alabama
    14 Buccaneers Jordan OT Mekhi Becton Louisville
    15 Broncos Ben DT Javon Kinlaw South Carolina
    16 Falcons Jordan CB C.J. Henderson Florida
    17 Cowboys Cole S Grant Delpit LSU
    18 Dolphins Evan OT Josh Jones Houston
    19 Raiders Ben QB Jordan Love Utah State
    20 Jaguars Nathan CB Trevon Diggs Alabama
    21 Eagles Ben OC Cesar Ruiz Michigan
    22 Vikings Jeff EDGE K’Lavon Chaisson LSU
    23 Patriots Stephen S Xavier McKinney Alabama
    24 Saints Cole WR Justin Jefferson LSU
    25 Vikings Jeff CB Jeff Gladney TCU
    26 Dolphins Evan S Antoine Winfield Jr. Minnesota
    27 Seahawks Justin EDGE Yetur Gross-Matos Penn State
    28 Ravens Segev LB Kenneth Murray Oklahoma
    29 Titans Dan F CB Jaylon Johnson Utah
    30 Packers Nathan WR Jalen Reagor TCU
    31 49ers Justin DT Ross Blacklock TCU
    32 Chiefs Noah CB Kristian Fulton LSU
    Round 2
    Pick Team Scout Player College
    33 Bengals John LB Patrick Queen LSU
    34 Colts Jeff WR Laviska Shenault Jr. Colorado
    35 Lions Nathan RB D’Andre Swift Georgia
    36 Giants John EDGE AJ Epenesa Iowa
    37 Chargers Nathan WR Brandon Aiyuk Arizona State
    38 Panthers Jordan CB AJ Terrell Clemson
    39 Dolphins Evan WR Tee Higgins Clemson
    40 Texans Jeff EDGE Zack Baun Wisconsin
    41 Browns John S Jeremy Chinn Southern Illinois
    42 Jaguars Nathan OT Ezra Cleveland Boise State
    43 Bears Noah WR Denzel Mims Baylor
    44 Colts Jeff TE Cole Kmet Notre Dame
    45 Buccaneers Jordan RB JK Dobbins Ohio State
    46 Broncos Ben WR Michael Pittman Jr. USC
    47 Falcons Jordan DT Marlon Davidson Auburn
    48 Jets Stephen OT Prince Tega Wanogho Auburn
    49 Steelers Dan W RB Jonathan Taylor Wisconsin
    50 Bears Noah S Kyle Dugger Lenoir-Rhyne
    51 Cowboys Cole OC Tyler Biadasz Wisconsin
    52 Rams Justin OT Austin Jackson USC
    53 Eagles Ben S Terrell Burgess Utah
    54 Bills Evan EDGE Terrell Lewis Alabama
    55 Ravens Segev OT Robert Hunt Louisiana
    56 Dolphins Evan RB Clyde Edwards-Helaire LSU
    57 Rams Justin EDGE Josh Uche Michigan
    58 Vikings Jeff OG Ben Bredeson Michigan
    59 Seahawks Justin DT Neville Gallimore Oklahoma
    60 Ravens Segev WR James Proche SMU
    61 Titans Dan F EDGE Curtis Weaver Boise State
    62 Packers Nathan LB Jordyn Brooks Texas Tech
    63 Chiefs Noah OC Lloyd Cushenberry III LSU
    64 Seahawks Justin OG Jonah Jackson Ohio State
    Round 3
    Pick Team Scout Player College
    65 Bengals John OT Isaiah Wilson Georgia
    66 Redskins John WR Chase Claypool Notre Dame
    67 Lions Nathan QB Jacob Eason Washington
    68 Jets Stephen CB Bryce Hall Virginia
    69 Panthers Jordan DT Justin Madubuike Texas A&M
    70 Dolphins Evan TE Adam Trautman Dayton
    71 Chargers Nathan DT Jordan Elliott Missouri
    72 Cardinals Justin DT Raekwon Davis Alabama
    73 Jaguars Nathan QB Jalen Hurts Oklahoma
    74 Browns John EDGE Darrell Taylor Tennessee
    75 Colts Jeff OT Lucas Niang TCU
    76 Buccaneers Jordan WR KJ Hamler Penn State
    77 Broncos Ben CB Noah Igbinoghene Auburn
    78 Falcons Jordan LB Malik Harrison Ohio State
    79 Jets Stephen EDGE Jonathan Greenard Florida
    80 Raiders Ben CB Amik Robertson Louisiana Tech
    81 Raiders Ben WR Van Jefferson Florida
    82 Cowboys Cole EDGE Kenny Willekes Michigan State
    83 Broncos Ben WR Gabriel Davis UCF
    84 Rams Justin LB Troy Dye Oregon
    85 Lions Nathan OG Netane Muti Fresno State
    86 Bills Evan RB Cam Akers Florida State
    87 Patriots Stephen TE Hunter Bryant Washington
    88 Saints Cole LB Akeem Davis-Gaither Appalachian State
    89 Vikings Jeff WR Tyler Johnson Minnesota
    90 Texans Jeff S Ashtyn Davis California
    91 Raiders Ben OT Saahdiq Charles LSU
    92 Ravens Segev EDGE Anfernee Jennings Alabama
    93 Titans Dan F WR Antonio Gandy-Golden Liberty
    94 Packers Nathan TE Thaddeus Moss LSU
    95 Broncos Ben LB Willie Gay Jr. Mississippi State
    96 Chiefs Noah EDGE Jabari Zuniga Florida
    97 Browns John CB Damon Arnette Ohio State
    98 Patriots Stephen WR Lynn Bowden Kentucky
    99 Giants John TE Harrison Bryant Florida Atlantic
    100 Patriots Stephen EDGE Julian Okwara Notre Dame
    101 Seahawks Justin OT Ben Bartch St. Johns
    102 Steelers Dan W DT Davon Hamilton Ohio State
    103 Eagles Ben WR Devin Duvernay Texas
    104 Rams Justin OG Shane Lemieux Oregon
    105 Vikings Jeff DT Larrell Murchison NC State
    106 Ravens Segev TE Albert Okwuegbunam Missouri
    Round 4
    Pick Team Scout Player College
    107 Bengals John WR Bryan Edwards South Carolina
    108 Redskins John CB Cam Dantzler Mississippi State
    109 Lions Nathan S Kenny Robinson West Virginia (XFL)
    110 Giants John CB Troy Pride Jr. Notre Dame
    111 Texans Jeff OC Matt Hennessy Temple
    112 Chargers Nathan LB Davion Taylor Colorado
    113 Panthers Jordan OG Solomon Kindley Georgia
    114 Cardinals Justin EDGE Bradlee Anae Utah
    115 Browns John WR K.J. Hill Ohio State
    116 Jaguars Nathan LB Logan Wilson Wyoming
    117 Buccaneers Jordan QB James Morgan FIU
    118 Broncos Ben OT Matt Peart Connecticut
    119 Falcons Jordan QB Jake Fromm Georgia
    120 Jets Stephen WR Collin Johnson Texas
    121 Raiders Ben LB Markus Bailey Purdue
    122 Colts Jeff OG John Simpson Clemson
    123 Cowboys Cole CB Dane Jackson Pittsburgh
    124 Steelers Dan W S K’Von Wallace Clemson
    125 Patriots Stephen QB Steven Montez Colorado
    126 Rams Justin WR Donovan Peoples-Jones MIchigan
    127 Eagles Ben WR Isaiah Hodgins Oregon State
    128 Bills Evan OG Logan Stenberg Kentucky
    129 Ravens Segev DT Jason Strowbridge North Carolina
    130 Saints Cole CB Kindle Vildor Georgia Southern
    131 Cardinals Justin OC Nick Harris Washington
    132 Vikings Jeff LB David Woodward Utah State
    133 Seahawks Justin TE Devin Asiasi UCLA
    134 Ravens Segev S Alohi Gilman Notre Dame
    135 Steelers Dan W OG Damien Lewis LSU
    136 Packers Nathan QB Anthony Gordon Washington State
    137 Jaguars Nathan OG Kevin Dotson Louisiana
    138 Chiefs Noah RB Zack Moss Utah
    139 Patriots Stephen EDGE Khalid Kareem Notre Dane
    140 Jaguars Nathan RB Eno Benjamin Arizona State
    141 Dolphins Evan OG John Molchon Boise State
    142 Redskins John TE Jared Pinkney Vanderbilt
    143 Falcons Jordan RB Darrynton Evans Appalachian State
    144 Seahawks Justin CB AJ Green Oklahoma State
    145 Eagles Ben RB A.J. Dillon Boston College
    146 Eagles Ben WR/RB Antonio Gibson Memphis
    Round 5
    Pick Team Scout Player College
    147 Bengals John OG Tyre Phillips Mississippi State
    148 Panthers Jordan CB Darnay Holmes UCLA
    149 Lions Nathan WR Isaiah Coulter Rhode Island
    150 Giants John OT Jack Driscoll Auburn
    151 Chargers Nathan OG Michael Onwenu Michigan
    152 Panthers Jordan S Geno Stone Iowa
    153 Dolphins Evan DT Leki Fotu Utah
    154 Dolphins Evan WR Jauan Jennings Tennessee
    155 Vikings Jeff OG Hakeem Adeniji Kansas
    156 49ers Justin EDGE Alex Highsmith Charlotte
    157 Jaguars Nathan WR Quintez Cephus Wisconsin
    158 Jets Stephen RB Anthony McFarland Maryland
    159 Raiders Ben CB Stanford Samuels Florida State
    160 Colts Jeff DT Rashard Lawrence LSU
    161 Buccaneers Jordan OG Calvin Throckmorton Oregon
    162 Redskins John LB Evan Weaver California
    163 Bears Noah CB Julian Blackmon Utah
    164 Cowboys Cole DT Khalil Davis Nebraska
    165 Jaguars Nathan TE Brycen Hopkins Purdue
    166 Lions Nathan EDGE Alton Robinson Syracuse
    167 Bills Evan CB Josiah Scott Michigan State
    168 Eagles Ben CB Reggie Robinson II Tulsa
    169 Saints Cole QB Kelly Bryant Missouri
    170 Ravens Segev CB Lamar Jackson Nebraska
    171 Texans Jeff WR John Hightower Boise State
    172 Patriots Stephen OT Yasir Durant Missouri
    173 Dolphins Evan LB Clay Johnston Baylor
    174 Titans Dan F DT James Lynch Baylor
    175 Packers Nathan S Jordan Fuller Ohio State
    176 49ers Justin LB Justin Strnad Wake Forest
    177 Chiefs Noah WR Darnell Mooney Tulane
    178 Broncos Ben OT Alex Taylor SC State
    179 Cowboys Cole WR Quartney Davis Texas A&M
    Round 6
    Pick Team Scout Player College
    180 Bengals John WR Quez Watkins Southern Miss
    181 Broncos Ben S Rodney Clemons SMU
    182 Lions Nathan LB Mykal Walker Fresno State
    183 Giants John LB Jacob Phillips LSU
    184 Panthers Jordan DT McTelvin Agim Arkansas
    185 Dolphins Evan CB Lavert Hill Michigan
    186 Chargers Nathan RB Lamical Perine Florida
    187 Browns John DT Raequan Williams Michigan State
    188 Bills Evan DT Benito Jones Ole Miss
    189 Jaguars Nathan S Brandon Jones Texas
    190 Eagles Ben S Antoine Brooks Jr. Maryland
    191 Jets Stephen OT Trey Adams Washington
    192 Packers Nathan DT Nick Coe Auburn
    193 Colts Jeff EDGE DJ Wonnum South Carolina
    194 Buccaneers Jordan EDGE Derek Tuszka North Dakota State
    195 Patriots Stephen EDGE Michael Divinty Jr. LSU
    196 Bears Noah OT Jon Runyan Michigan
    197 Colts Jeff RB Jason Huntley New Mexico State
    198 Steelers Dan W EDGE Trevis Gipson Tulsa
    199 Rams Justin CB Michael Ojemudia Iowa
    200 Bears Noah OG Justin Herron Wake Forest
    201 Vikings Jeff CB Javelin Guidry Utah
    202 Cardinals Justin TE Josiah Deguara Cincinnati
    203 Saints Cole OC Darryl Williams Mississippi State
    204 Patriots Stephen WR Kalija Lipscomb Vanderbilt
    205 Vikings Jeff S Jaylinn Hawkins California
    206 Jaguars Nathan OT Cameron Clark Charlotte
    207 Bills Evan OG Tremayne Anchrum Clemson
    208 Packers Nathan OC Cohl Cabral Arizona State
    209 Packers Nathan WR Juwan Johnson Oregon
    210 49ers Justin CB Delrick Abrams Colorado
    211 Jets Stephen CB Essang Bassey Wake Forest
    212 Patriots Stephen EDGE Casey Toohill Stanford
    213 Patriots Stephen S Tanner Muse Clemson
    214 Seahawks Justin RB Raymond Calais Louisiana
    Round 7
    Pick Team Scout Player College
    215 Bengals John CB Harrison Hand Temple
    216 Redskins John RB Deejay Dallas Miami (FL)
    217 49ers Justin OT Scott Frantz Kansas State
    218 Giants John K Tyler Bass Georgia Southern
    219 Vikings Jeff RB Darius Anderson TCU
    220 Chargers Nathan WR Malcolm Perry Navy
    221 Panthers Jordan OT Charlie Heck North Carolina
    222 Cardinals Justin LB Joe Bachie Jr. Michigan State
    223 Jaguars Nathan CB Levonta Taylor Florida State
    224 Titans Dan F RB Michael Warren II Cincinnati
    225 Ravens Segev RB James Robinson Illinois State
    226 Bears Noah EDGE Carter Coughlin Minnesota
    227 Dolphins Evan WR Jeff Thomas Miami (FL)
    228 Falcons Jordan OG Kyle Murphy Rhode Island
    229 Redskins John TE Stephen Sullivan LSU
    230 Patriots Stephen K Rodrigo Blankenship Georgia
    231 Cowboys Cole TE Colby Parkinson Stanford
    232 Steelers Dan W LB Shaquille Quarterman Miami (FL)
    233 Bears Noah RB Ke’Shawn Vaughn Vanderbilt
    234 Rams Justin QB Tyler Huntley Utah
    235 Lions Nathan P Braden Mann Texas A&M
    236 Packers Nathan S J.R. Reed Georgia
    237 Titans Dan F CB Javaris Davis Auburn
    238 Giants John QB Cole McDonald Hawaii
    239 Bills Evan LB Francis Bernard Utah
    240 Texans Jeff DT Bravvion Roy Baylor
    241 Buccaneers Jordan LB Broderick Washington Jr. Texas Tech
    242 Packers Nathan LB Cale Garrett Missouri
    243 Titans Dan F TE Cheyenne O’Grady Arkansas
    244 Browns John CB/S Jalen Elliott Notre Dame
    245 49ers Justin S Josh Metellus Michigan
    246 Dolphins Evan CB DeMarkus Acy Missouri
    247 Giants John S Brian Cole II Mississippi State
    248 Texans Jeff OT Terence Steele Texas Tech
    249 Vikings Jeff QB Nate Stanley Iowa
    250 Texans Jeff CB Chris Williamson Minnesota
    251 Dolphins Evan LB Michael Pinckney Miami (FL)
    252 Broncos Ben CB Zane Lewis Air Force
    253 Vikings Jeff DT Garrett Marino UAB
    254 Broncos Ben EDGE Bryce Huff Memphis
    255 Giants John RB Javon Leake Maryland

    Below are the scout/team assignments:

    Nathan Cooper: Lions,  Packers, Jaguars, Chargers

    John Todd: Bengals, Browns, Giants, Redskins

    Justin Stine: Cardinals, Rams, 49ers,  Seahawks

    Jeff Dean: Texans, Colts, Vikings

    Ben Hrkach: Broncos, Raiders, Eagles

    Jordan Edwards: Falcons, Panthers, Buccaneers

    Evan Butler: Bills, Dolphins

    Stephen Marciello: Patriots, Jets

    Noah Gatsik: Bears, Chiefs

    Cole Ratliff: Cowboys, Saints

    Segev Goldberg: Ravens

    Dan Foehrenbach: Titans

    Dan Wallie:  Steelers

  • Which college programs produce the best NFL players by position?

    By John Shirley

    College fan bases love to argue over which school produces the best players. Monikers such as “Linebacker U” or “DB U”’ get thrown around a lot, but are normally backed up solely based on opinion or by how many players have been drafted from each school in the last few years. By using SIS’s Total Points value metric, we can actually show how much NFL value different colleges have produced at each position. 

    To determine which college can claim the title at each position group, we will sum each NFL player’s Total Points over the previous three seasons (2017-2019), and the school with the most total value wins. 

    Running Back

    Top Colleges by 2017-2019 NFL Total Points 

    CollegePlayersTotal Points
    Alabama9214
    Stanford2152
    Oklahoma6141
    Georgia3121
    Miami (FL)6115

    Carried by two former Heisman Trophy winners, Mark Ingram and Derrick Henry, Alabama takes the crown as “Running Back U”. Henry leads the way with 61 Total Points and Ingram follows close behind with 60 Total Points. There has also been significant depth produced from Alabama, as Kenyan Drake, Josh Jacobs, and T.J. Yeldon have each contributed over 20 Total Points. 

    Next Up for Alabama: Najee Harris 

    Wide Receiver

    Top Colleges by 2017-2019 NFL Total Points 

    CollegePlayersTotal Points
    Clemson10297
    California8255
    USC7223
    Alabama8206
    LSU8199

    New Arizona Cardinal, DeAndre Hopkins, has been Clemson’s key player at receiver, as he has contributed 109 of their 297 Total Points over the past three seasons. Other former first round receivers Mike Williams (48 Total Points) and Sammy Watkins (40 Total Points) have contributed as well. Clemson has also produced solid NFL contributors Adam Humphries (42 Total Points), Martavis Bryant (26 Total Points), and Hunter Renfrow (13 Total Points during his rookie year in 2019).

    Next Up for Clemson: Tee Higgins 

    • 37 College Total Points in 2019
    • SIS’s 7th-Ranked WR in the 2020 NFL Draft 

    Tight End

    Top Colleges by 2017-2019 NFL Total Points 

    CollegePlayersTotal Points
    Stanford7205
    Iowa5153
    Cincinnati1139
    Western Kentucky3136
    Notre Dame6128

    It should be no surprise that Stanford and Iowa are at the top of the list for producing NFL caliber tight ends. Iowa might be able to take the crown in a few seasons, if George Kittle continues to dominate and 2019 first rounders T.J. Hockenson and Noah Fant emerge as legitimate weapons. But, for now Tight End U belongs to Stanford. Zach Ertz and Austin Hooper have led the way with 72 and 64 Total Points, respectively, while Stanford has also gained positive contributions from Levine Toilolo, Coby Fleener, Kaden Smith, Dalton Schultz, and Ryan Hewitt.

    Next Up for Stanford: Colby Parkinson

    • 25 College Total Points in 2019
    • SIS’s 15th-Ranked TE in the 2020 NFL Draft 

    Offensive Line

    Top Colleges by 2017-2019 NFL Total Points 

    CollegePlayersTotal Points
    Wisconsin10468
    Notre Dame8450
    Florida12390
    LSU8332
    Ohio State10331

    Wisconsin has a reputation as an offensive line factory, and it is well earned based on Total Points. An impressive 10 former Badger linemen have seen snaps in the NFL over the past three seasons, including five who have accumulated at least 50 Total Points: Ryan Ramczk (108), Rob Havenstein (88), Kevin Zeitler (83), Rick Wagner (74), and Travis Frederick (53).

    Next Up for Wisconsin: Tyler Biadasz

    • 41 College Total Points in 2019
    • SIS’s 2nd-Ranked C in the 2020 NFL Draft

    Defensive Line

    Top Colleges by 2017-2019 NFL Total Points 

    CollegePlayersTotal Points
    Ohio State10413
    Michigan10372
    USC9349
    Miami (FL)11327
    Alabama13323

    Ohio State has consistently produced some of the NFL’s elite defensive ends over the past few seasons. Cameron Heyward leads the way with 109 Total Points, with Joey Bosa following closely with 100 Total Points.

    Ohio State has also gotten large contributions from Johnathan Hankins with 71 Total Points and Nick Bosa, who accumulated an impressive 61 Total Points in his rookie year. Other solid Total Points contributors include: Sam Hubbard (39), Tyquan Lewis (16), and Dre’Mont Jones (12).

    Next Up for Ohio State: Chase Young

    • 64 College Total Points in 2019
    • SIS’s 1st-Ranked Edge in the 2020 NFL Draft
    • SIS’s Top Overall Prospect in the 2020 NFL Draft

    Next Up for Ohio State: Davon Hamilton

    • 23 College Total Points in 2019
    • SIS’s 6th-Ranked NT in the 2020 NFL Draft

    Linebacker

    Top Colleges by 2017-2019 NFL Total Points 

    CollegePlayersTotal Points
    Kentucky7467
    Georgia9466
    UCLA8458
    Alabama11381
    Mississippi State5379

    Kentucky claiming the title as “Linebacker U” is probably the biggest surprise of these lists (it finished ahead of Georgia by one point). But, when broken down by individual, it is easy to see the talent Kentucky has produced. Bud Dupree (138 Total Points) and Za’Darius Smith (82) have both become pass rushing threats on the edge, while Danny Trevathan (84), Wesley Woodyard (81), and Avery Williamson (53) have put together solid careers as off-ball linebackers. Though, the most talented of them all might end up being Jaguars edge rusher Josh Allen, who had 29 Total Points in his rookie season. 

    Next Up for Kentucky: Jamar Watson

    • 35 College Total Points in 2019
    • Entering Senior year in 2020

    Defensive Back

    Top Colleges by 2017-2019 NFL Total Points 

    CollegePlayersTotal Points
    Alabama13728
    LSU11599
    Ohio State12575
    Florida State10485
    Florida13384

    “DB U” might be the most hotly debated among all the position groups, with fan bases from LSU, Miami, Ohio State, Florida State, and Florida all laying some sort of claim. But based on Total Points, Alabama claims the title, and it’s not really that close. While LSU might have the top single player among those schools in Tre’Davious White (142 Total Points), Alabama’s incredible depth wins out. Alabama has produced nine defensive backs who have 40 or more Total Points over the past three NFL seasons: Marlon Humphrey (128), Kareem Jackson (122), Eddie Jackson (90), Landon Collins (86), Ha Ha Clinton-Dix (80), Minkah Fitzpatrick (64), Dre Kirkpatrick (55), Ronnie Harrison (53), and Levi Wallace (40). 

    Next Up for Alabama: Trevon Diggs

    • 53 College Total Points in 2019
    • SIS’s 2nd Ranked CB in the 2020 NFL Draft

    Next Up for Alabama: Xavier McKinney

    • 66 College Total Points in 2019
    • SIS’s 3rd Ranked S in the 2020 NFL Draft

     

  • Check out our NFL Draft scouting videos!

    Check out our YouTube page

    We’ve got scouting videos up on

    Markus Bailey

    Joe Burrow

    Rodney Clemens

    Dane Jackson

    Van Jefferson

    Larrell Murchison

    Netane Muti

    Jared Pinkney

    Jalen Reagor

    K’Lavon Chiasson

    With comprehensive analysis from prospect expert, Nathan Cooper. Check it out!

  • Evaluating CB Needs For Teams That Use Man/Zone The Most

    By LOGAN KING

    Sports Info Solutions (SIS) brings you the second annual edition of The SIS Football Rookie Handbook, with scouting reports and statistical breakdowns on over 280 college football players who are likely to be drafted or signed as rookie free agents in 2020 (a glossary for the below stats can be found here). New features for this year include unique and informative NFL team pages, research deep-dives by the SIS R&D team, and—for the first time ever—the NCAA version of their flagship football statistic, Total Points

    With the 2020 NFL Draft right around the corner, this article follows last week’s offensive line draft recommendations, focusing on potential draft targets for the 2019 league leaders in percentage of coverages from zone and man concepts. 

    Each team is examined in terms of their coverage tendencies last season, projected coverage tendencies for this season (based on coaching changes), and potential draft picks (based on scheme fit, roster needs, and draft position). More information on these prospects can be found in the SIS Football Rookie Handbook.

    The table below displays the league leaders in percentage of coverage schemes from both zone and man. 

     

    2019 Coverage Tendency Leaderboards
    Man Coverage Zone Coverage
    Rank Team Percent of Plays Rank Team Percent of Plays
    1 Patriots 54% 1 Chargers 75%
    1 Lions 54% 2 Panthers 68%
    3 Dolphins 44% 3 Seahawks 66%

    Man

    New England Patriots

    It should come as no surprise that the Patriots lead the league in percentage of defensive plays run from man coverage, as this is the third year in which the team has led the league in this statistic. Additionally, the rest of the top three teams in man coverage usage are all led by coaches from the defensive side of the Bill Belichick coaching tree. Belichick will lead the defense once more in 2020 after a near historic first half of the season in 2019 and a very strong defensive season overall.

    New England returns its core group of corners from 2019, which includes four players all ranking in the top 15 at the position in Total Points per snap. While the team will likely look to address more pressing needs at other positions early in the draft, some depth options for the Patriots’ man-heavy defense in the later rounds include:

    • Noah Igbinoghene, Auburn; Projected Position: Outside/Slot Corner
    • Kindle Vildor, Georgia State; Projected Position: Outside Corner
    • Thakarius Keyes, Tulane; Projected Position: Slot Corner

    Detroit Lions

    The Lions tied for the league lead in percentage of plays run from man coverage in 2019, but finished 29th in EPA against per play when playing man. Detroit moved on from defensive coordinator and primary defensive play caller Paul Pasqualoni this offseason in favor of former Eagles DB’s coach Cory Undlin. 

    Matt Patricia began to take over some of the defensive play calling responsibilities for the Lions towards the latter part of last season, so it remains to be seen as to who will call the defensive shots for the team in 2020. However, given Philadelphia’s strong performance against the pass when in man coverage during Undlin’s tenure (top 5 in EPA against per play in three of the last four seasons), Detroit appears to be sticking to its heavy man-coverage strategy, moving forward. 

    With the departure of their two primary outside corners from 2019, Darius Slay and Rashaan Melvin, the Lions are among the teams who have lost the most in terms of Total Points at the cornerback position this offseason. While the addition of Desmond Trufant partially addresses this issue, outside corner is a primary concern that should be addressed in this draft. With the third overall pick and nine picks total, potential prospects for the Lions defensive system include:

    • Jeffrey Okudah, Ohio State; Projected Position: Outside/Slot Corner
    • C.J. Henderson, Florida; Projected Position: Outside Corner
    • Kristian Fulton, Louisiana State; Projected Position: Outside Corner

    Miami Dolphins

    The Dolphins come in at third in percentage of plays in which man coverage was used in 2019, but next-to-last in EPA against per play on those plays. Despite a new face at defensive coordinator in Josh Boyer, the defensive approach isn’t expected to change drastically as Boyer has worked with head coach Brian Flores ever since starting with the Patriots in 2006. 

    Miami made a big splash in free agency with the signing of Byron Jones, who ranked 30th in Total Points among corners last season and will step into an outside corner role for the team. The secondary has strong depth with the versatile Nik Needham (50% of snaps from outside and 45% of snaps from the slot) and slot corner Erik Rowe both ranking in the top 45 in Total Points at the position, which will come in handy with Xavien Howard facing league discipline for off-the-field issues. While likely looking to address other needs early in the draft, Miami has 14 total picks in the draft and can certainly add depth, should Howard be gone long-term. Potential players who fit in the Dolphins’ man-heavy scheme include:

    • Jeff Gladney, TCU; Projected Position: Outside/Slot Corner
    • Damon Arnette, Ohio State; Projected Position: Outside Corner
    • Troy Pride Jr., Notre Dame; Projected Position: Outside/Slot Corner

    Zone

    Los Angeles Chargers

    Much like the Patriots and man coverage percentage, the Chargers led the league in percentage of plays run from zone coverage for the third straight year. With Gus Bradley remaining at the helm, not much is expected to change by way of defensive philosophy in 2020. 

    Following a top 10 finish at the corner position in Total Points last season, LA adds Chris Harris Jr. to an already stout group. Harris was lined up outside on 70% of his snaps last season and finished 83rd in Total Points among corners. However, he finished 21st in Total Points at the position in 2018 as he lined up in the slot on 73% of his plays. Ideally, Harris will aid Desmond King II in the slot, after King’s regression last season. 

    On the outside, LA boasts two players who finished in the top 20 in Total Points at the position in Casey Hayward Jr. and Michael Davis. With the sixth overall pick, the team will look to improve at other positions early on in the draft. Here are potential options to add depth to the Chargers’ zone-heavy scheme in the later rounds:

    • Josiah Scott, Michigan State; Projected Position: Slot Corner
    • Lamar Jackson, Nebraska; Projected Position: Outside/Slot Corner
    • Shyheim Carter, Alabama; Projected Position: Slot Corner

    Carolina Panthers

    In the first season under head coach Matt Rhule and defensive coordinator Phil Snow, it is unclear what the defensive philosophy will be for Carolina. With the majority of the defensive back position still intact from the previous season and the coaching staff’s recent experience against Big 12 offenses, the Panthers may stick to a zone-heavy approach in pass coverage. 

    Through the offseason, the Panthers lost the 20th ranked cornerback in terms of Total Points when James Bradberry left. Bradberry’s departure leaves a large hole on the outside, where he played 76% of his snaps. Ross Cockrell ranked 25th in Total Points among corners while playing 55% of his snaps in the slot and 37% on the outside, but the team’s remaining options at corner, Donte Jackson and Javien Elliot, ranked 66th and 112th in Total Points, respectively, among the position. With the seventh pick in the draft, Carolina could address their need for an outside corner. Possible prospects include:

    • Trevon Diggs, Alabama; Projected Position: Outside Corner
    • Bryce Hall, Virginia; Projected Position: Outside Corner
    • A.J. Terrell, Clemson; Projected Position: Outside Corner

    Seattle Seahawks

    In his second season as the Seahawks defensive play caller, Ken Norton increased his team’s frequency of zone coverage, rising to third place in percentage of plays run with zone coverage. With few changes to the coaching staff, Seattle’s defensive approach should remain zone-focused in 2020. 

    The signing of Quinton Dunbar, who ranked 31st in Total Points per snap among the position, brings an improvement to a Seahawks CB group that ranked 28th in Total Points in 2019. Tre Flowers and Shaquill Griffin led the team in both snaps from the outside and snaps from the slot last season. Ranking first in percentage of snaps from base defense (four defensive backs) in 2019, Seattle is looking for corners who can play both inside and outside, rather than specialize in one area. With four picks in the top three rounds, Seattle has the potential to address this need early. Potential fits for their system include:

    • A.J. Green, Oklahoma State; Projected Position: Outside/Slot Corner
    • Lamar Jackson, Nebraska; Projected Position: Outside/Slot Corner
    • Delrick Abrams Jr., Colorado; Projected Position: Outside/Slot Corner

     

  • Should Christian McCaffrey be valued like a wide receiver?

    by NATE WELLER

    On Monday, the Panthers announced a four-year $64-million extension for star running back Christian McCaffrey. The $16M average annual value clears the bar set by Ezekiel Elliott last offseason and makes McCaffrey the highest-paid running back in the league’s history.

    As is customary with all things related to running back value, the move has sparked debate. Todd Gurley was supposedly the exception to the rule about paying running backs, and he was already released this offseason to try and get the Rams out of cap jail. Elliott was still one of the best backs in the league in 2019, but his contract undeniably loomed large in the decision to cut ties with Bryon Jones and the ongoing negotiations with Dak Prescott.

    Stop me if you’ve heard this before, but McCaffrey’s situation is unique. The argument in McCaffrey’s favor doesn’t revolve around his rushing performance at all, but rather his ability in the passing game. McCaffrey is coming off of a season where he caught 116 passes for 1,005 yards. His 40 Receiving Points Earned were 14 points clear of the next best running back, Austin Ekeler, and are the most by a running back since Total Points’ inaugural season in 2016, outpacing his own 2018 campaign by nine points.

    If the argument is that McCaffrey deserves to be paid like a wide receiver, though, it makes the most sense to compare his receiving numbers to other receivers. His 40 Receiving Points Earned in 2019 would have ranked him 18th among all pass-catchers.  

    It’s also fair to wonder how much McCaffrey’s usage has impacted his overall numbers. In 2019, more than half of McCaffrey’s catches occurred at or behind the line of scrimmage, and his 16 Points Earned on these plays was more than double the next closest player. 

    McCaffrey was far less dangerous when utilized in more traditional wide receiver alignments. On 27 targets from slot or wide alignments McCaffrey managed only 6.9 Yards per Target (Y/T). Put into context, among 86 players with at least 50 targets lined up in the slot or wide last season, only 12 posted a Y/T lower than McCaffrey’s.

    None of this is to say that McCaffrey is a bad player. The Panthers are undoubtedly a better team with him than without him. All of his value as a receiver comes in addition to him being a top-ten rusher. He has led all running backs in Total Points two seasons running, and has produced despite playing alongside Kyle Allen and the shell of Cam Newton. The current state of the NFL, though, makes paying running backs top dollar a dangerous proposition, and the argument that McCaffrey should be valued like one of the league’s best receivers falls flat.

  • Redrafting the 2017 NFL Draft

    It’s good to look back after three seasons to assess a team’s draft class to see if their players are helping the team or if they were busts. We attempted to redo the first round of the 2017 NFL Draft to re-select players with three years of additional knowledge.

    In most cases, we tried to take into account the position of the player they actually took and what their team needs were, but most importantly who the best players in the Draft were. Here’s what we came up with:

    Selections

    #1 – Cleveland Browns: QB Patrick Mahomes, Texas Tech

    Actual Selection: DE Myles Garrett, Texas A&M

    Mahomes was actually picked #10

    Patrick Mahomes is a no-brainer. The Super Bowl LIV Champion has already won a Super Bowl MVP, NFL MVP, and been named First-Team All-Pro in his short career. In 2019, he ranked in the top six among qualifying quarterbacks in EPA, Total Points, Positive % and IQR. That all comes off a 2018 season in which he ranked either No. 1 or 2 in each of those metrics. -Nathan

    #2 – Chicago Bears: QB Deshaun Watson, Clemson

    Actual Selection: QB Mitchell Trubisky, North Carolina

    Watson was actually picked #12

    The Bears have been much maligned for not only taking Mitchell Trubisky over Mahomes and DeShaun Watson, but trading up one pick to do so. Trubisky has ranked 30th, 28th and 28th in Passing Total Points over his three seasons in Chicago, and his one playoff appearance in 2018 came on the backs of the NFL’s No. 1 ranked defense in EPA.

    Watson was great before tearing his ACL halfway through his rookie campaign, but two healthy seasons later with two playoff appearances and a shootout 2019 Divisional Round loss to the No. 1 pick in this re-draft under his belt, the Texans and Chiefs are set up for success while the Bears find themselves back in the QB market. In this exercise, they don’t make the same mistake. -John

    #3 – San Francisco 49ers: DE Myles Garrett, Texas A&M

    Actual Selection: DE Solomon Thomas, Stanford

    Garrett was actually picked # 1

    Though not the No. 1 pick, Myles Garrett still finds himself in the top 3. He’s accumulated over 30 sacks in three seasons and ranked 2nd in Sack % and 22nd in Pressure % during the 2019 season. The Niners clearly wanted help off the edge to generate pressure on the quarterback. A Garrett-Bosa pairing coming off the edges in Super Bowl LIV may have changed the outcome with the Lombardi Trophy headed back to San Francisco instead of Kansas City. -Nathan

    #4 – Jacksonville Jaguars: LB T.J. Watt, Wisconsin

    Actual Selection: RB Leonard Fournette, LSU

    Watt was actually picked #30

    The Jaguars were looking to bolster their offense in 2017 with the selection of Leonard Fournette, a dominant college running back. While his addition helped lead the Jaguars on a strong playoff run his rookie year, he hasn’t lived up to his top-five pick value. T.J. Watt finished third in Defensive Player of the Year voting in 2019 and was the No. 1 ranked edge defender in Total Points, 1st against the pass and 5th against the run.

    Adding Watt to the Jaguars dominant defense of 2017 (NFL-best in EPA and Positive%) would be the definition of strengthening a strength, but he could also have been the lone cog to remain after its recent purge of stars. -John

    #5 – Tennessee Titans: WR JuJu Smith-Schuster, USC

    Actual Selection: WR Corey Davis, Western Michigan

    Smith-Schuster was actually picked #62

    The Titans were hungry for receiver help in 2017, but instead of taking Western Michigan’s Corey Davis, they instead go with JuJu Smith-Schuster in our redraft. Though his production was way down in 2019 due to an injured Ben Roethlisberger and a carousel of quarterbacks, he had very productive seasons his first 2 years in the league. In 2018, a season in which he ranked 5th in receiving yards, 6th in Total Points, and 16th in EPA among all pass catchers. -Nathan

    #6 – New York Jets: S Jamal Adams, LSU

    Actual Selection: S Jamal Adams, LSU

    The first of these re-draft selections to remain the same, Jamal Adams has been everything the Jets had hoped when they drafted him sixth overall in 2017. He was named to the All-Rookie team that year, then was a 2nd Team All-Pro in 2018 and a 1st Team All-Pro last year. He’s finished 3rd and 5th in Total Points among all safeties the past two seasons, with elite marks against both the run and pass. -John

    #7 – Los Angeles Chargers: CB Tre’Davious White, LSU

    Actual Selection: WR Mike Williams, Clemson

    White was actually picked #27

    With it seeming to be too early for a receiver and Smith-Schuster already off the board, the Chargers could dip into the defensive side of the ball to select Tre’Davious White. Among CBs seeing at least 50 passes thrown their way in 2019, White led the league in Total Points with 45. He also ranked 3rd in QBR Against (31.8) and 6th in yards per attempt (5.9). White is proving to be one of the league’s top shutdown corners, and a Chargers secondary that included White with Casey Hayward, Derwin James, and Nasir Adderley would look pretty daunting to opposing quarterbacks. -Nathan

    #8 – Carolina Panthers: RB Christian McCaffrey, Stanford

    Actual Selection: RB Christian McCaffrey, Stanford

    Another pick that the selecting team would happily do over again. While the running back position has been devalued in the modern NFL and spending a premium draft pick on one is often met with criticism, Christian McCaffrey has become the prototype of what the league is looking for in the backfield. He put up only the third 1,000/1,000-yard rushing and receiving season in NFL history in 2019, despite having his total Air Yards be less than 0. In other words, he manufactured all of his receiving yards (and then some) after the catch. He is a three-down back in its truest form and has also proven to be supremely durable, compiling over 1,000 touches without missing a game so far in his career. -John

    #9 – Cincinnati Bengals: RB Alvin Kamara, Tennessee

    Actual Selection: WR John Ross, Washington

    Kamara was actually picked #67

    John Ross has been a bust. The Bengals instead choose Alvin Kamara, who’s been one of the best dual-threat backs in the NFL over the past couple of years. Among running backs with over 100 attempts, in 2019, Kamara ranked 3rd in Positive % and 5th in Broken Tackle % as a rusher, and was 3rd in receptions, 3rd in First Downs, 4th in Broken Tackles among RBs as a receiver. Since coming into the league in 2017, he ranks 11th in the NFL with 243 receptions. Kamara instantly makes the Bengals offense more dynamic in both the run and pass game. -Nathan

    #10 – Kansas City Chiefs: CB Marshon Lattimore, Ohio State

    Actual Selection: QB Patrick Mahomes, Texas Tech

    Lattimore was actually picked #11

    With Patrick Mahomes not available for the Chiefs this time around, they take a player who was taken one pick later in 2017 and keep rolling with Alex Smith at quarterback. Marshon Lattimore was the Defensive Rookie of the Year for the Saints after collecting five interceptions, and has proven to be one of the top corners in this class on a perennial contender. He was targeted the 10th-most times in the NFL last year while allowing a completion percentage below 50%. -John

    #11 – New Orleans Saints: TE George Kittle, Iowa

    Actual Selection: CB Marshon Lattimore, Ohio State

    Kittle was actually picked #146

    George Kittle is a steal at this point. He fills the void left by Jimmy Graham a few years prior giving Drew Brees another offensive weapon. In 2018-19 combined, he recorded 173 receptions, 2,430 yards, and 10 touchdowns. In 2019, he led all tight ends in receiving Total Points with 47. Not only has he made a large impact as a receiver, but also as a blocker, as he tied for the least amount of blown blocks in 2019. -Nathan

    #12 – Houston Texans: T Ryan Ramczyk, Wisconsin

    Actual Selection: QB Deshaun Watson, Clemson

    Ramczyk was actually picked #32

    Sensing a trend? Three of the first 12 picks in this re-draft were originally taken by the New Orleans Saints. Ryan Ramczyk was the second of their two first-round picks (Lattimore) and they clearly hit on both. Ramczyk has been a dominant presence on the Total Points leaderboards in his career, ranking 2nd, 9th, and 4th at his position in his three seasons. He’s allowed three or fewer sacks on nearly 500-plus pass protection snaps each of those years, as well. -John

    #13 – Arizona Cardinals: S Eddie Jackson, Alabama

    Actual Selection: LB Haason Reddick, Temple

    Jackson was actually picked #112

    The Cardinals were looking for back-end help throughout this draft and instead of going linebacker with their first pick, they instead select Eddie Jackson in the first round. He’s already recorded 10 interceptions as a safety, in his first three years in the league and has been named to the Pro Bowl each of the past two seasons. His 2018 campaign was one in which he racked up over 50 tackles and 6 interceptions, helping him to be named as a First Team All-Pro. -Nathan

    #14 – Philadelphia Eagles: WR Chris Godwin, Penn State

    Actual Selection: DE Derek Barnett, Tennessee

    Godwin was actually picked #84

    The Eagles have brought in some decent weapons in recent years to supplement Zach Ertz at tight end, such as Alshon Jeffrey, Desean Jackson, and others, but injuries to the receiving corps and Carson Wentz have hindered the passing game. This culminated in a 2019 season in which Wentz became the first QB to ever throw for 4,000 yards without a 500-yard receiver. Coincidentally, this was also the year Chris Godwin broke out into a superstar, ranking 3rd in total receiving yards and No. 1 in yards after catch among receivers. -John

    #15 – Indianapolis Colts: CB Marlon Humphrey, Alabama

    Actual Selection: S Malik Hooker, Ohio State

    Humphrey was actually picked #16

    The Colts original pick of Malik Hooker has been good since he finally recovered from early injuries, but with Marlon Humphrey still on the board, they go that route this time. In 2019, Humphrey ranked 5th in Yards Per Attempt among CB’s with at least 30 targets. He also possessed a Completion %, Deserved Catch %, and QBR Against that all ranked in the top 25. Those numbers helped earn him a Pro Bowl spot and be named 1st Team All-Pro in 2019. -Nathan

    #16 – Baltimore Ravens: WR Kenny Golladay, Northern Illinois

    Actual Selection: CB Marlon Humphrey, Alabama

    Golladay was actually picked #96

    Humphrey, the Ravens actual pick, goes one spot ahead of here, so Baltimore pivots to the offensive side of the ball. The Ravens have been looking for a big play receiver for a number of years, and in this re-draft they get one in Kenny Golladay. Golladay led the NFL in receiving touchdowns in 2019 and put up the 5th-most Air Yards of all players. He fits well in reality with the big arm of Matthew Stafford, and would have done so with Joe Flacco and Lamar Jackson, a role that 2019 draft pick Marquise Brown has now filled. -John

    #17 – Washington Redskins: DE Jonathan Allen, Alabama

    Actual Selection: DE Jonathan Allen, Alabama

    Another spot in the first round where the team drafting is satisfied with the pick they made three years ago. Jonathan Allen has been a solid contributor on the defensive line for the Redskins. In 2019, among DL with at least 25 solo tackles, he ranked 4th in total tackles with 69 while also having the 5th-lowest Missed Tackle Rate. He’s also amassed 15 sacks in his first three seasons in Washington. They’re happy with their selection. -Nathan

    #18 – Tennessee Titans: CB Desmond King, Iowa

    Actual Selection: CB Adoree’ Jackson, USC

    King was actually picked #151

    Adoree’ Jackson hasn’t been a bad pick for the Titans, but in this re-draft Tennessee again stays with the same position and finds a possible slight upgrade in the Chargers’ Desmond King. He was a 1st Team All-Pro DB in 2018 and a 2nd Team punt returner, another role Jackson currently fills for the Titans. He took a bit of a step back last season, but with the prevalence of 11 personnel in today’s game, slot cornerbacks are as important as any defensive position, having to defend two-way go’s and operate through traffic. King has played nearly 94% of his snaps in the slot the past two seasons. -John

    #19 – Tampa Bay Buccaneers: T Dion Dawkins, Temple

    Actual Selection: TE O.J. Howard, Alabama

    Dawkins was actually picked #63

    Dion Dawkins has been one of the few offensive linemen that have made some sort of positive impact from this draft class. The Buccaneers have desperately been looking for offensive line help over the past few years, and decide to go with Dawkins in the first round. Dawkins has surely been a little streaky at times, but has solidified himself as a starter on the Bills offensive line. He would replace current Buccaneers LT Donovan Smith who has consistently possessed one of the top blown block rates since coming into the league in 2015, most notably with 42 blown blocks in 2017. -Nathan

    #20 – Denver Broncos: RB Dalvin Cook, Florida State

    Actual Selection: T Garett Bolles, Utah

    Cook was actually picked #41

    To say Garett Bolles hasn’t lived up to his draft slot is putting it mildly. The Broncos have taken and missed shots on multiple different running backs the past few years. It wasn’t until they hit on Phillip Lindsay after the 2018 draft ended that they found a consistent contributor. In Dalvin Cook, Denver gets a dynamic ball carrier who has dealt with some injuries and may be best served leading a committee to stay fresh. His Rushing Total Points/1,000 rates through his first two injury-shortened seasons were each top-3 in the NFL. -John

    #21 – Detroit Lions: LB Zach Cunningham, Vanderbilt

    Actual Selection: LB Jarrad Davis, Florida

    Cunningham was actually picked #57

    I liked Zach Cunningham coming into the 2017 Draft and thought that’s who the Lions should’ve taken instead of Jarrad Davis. In this re-draft, the Lions make it happen. Cunningham is an athletic sideline-to-sideline presence that can play all three downs against both the run and pass game. He’s racked up over 330 tackles so far in his career, with at least 100 tackles each of the last two seasons, including 143 in 2019. He also led linebackers and ranked 3rd among all defensive players in Run Defense Points Saved last season.

    #22 – Miami Dolphins: S Malik Hooker, Ohio State

    Actual Selection: DE Charles Harris, Missouri

    Hooker was actually picked #15

    Original No. 22 overall pick Charles Harris has amassed 3.5 sacks so far in his career. Malik Hooker goes a few spots after his initial draft slot, but after a slowed start due to injury, he’s made an impact each season of his career. As he was projected to, Hooker roams the deep middle of Indianapolis’ defense and has come up with multiple interceptions as an over-the-top defender every year. He would have fit nicely behind Reshad Jones, Xavien Howard and Minkah Fitzpatrick, if only for a short time. -John

    #23 – New York Giants: WR Mike Williams, Clemson

    Actual Selection: TE Evan Engram, Ole Miss

    Williams was actually picked #7

    The Giants have had a tough time finding playmakers on the outside. Though original pick Evan Engram has shown flashes, Mike Williams seems to be a better candidate to give the Giants what they are looking for at receiver to stretch the field now that he fell to this spot in the re-draft. After an injury-filled rookie season in which he only played 10 games and caught 11 passes, Williams has burst onto the scene in 2018 and 2019. His 2018 season included 43 catches and 10 touchdowns, while he grabbed 49 passes for over 1,000 yards in 2019. -Nathan

    #24 – Oakland Raiders: S Budda Baker, Washington

    Actual Selection: CB Gareon Conley, Ohio State

    Baker was actually picked #36

    Despite knocks for his size coming out in 2017, Budda Baker has outplayed his draft position and proven to be an impact safety at multiple levels of the defense. He was named a 1st Team All-Pro performer for his work on special teams his rookie season, and has worn numerous hats throughout his career.

    Over the past two seasons, he has taken 48% of his snaps from a slot corner position, 35% from a safety alignment, and 15% in the box. He finished 4th in the NFL in total tackles in 2019, the only non-linebacker in the top 10. Not bad for a sub 5’10” DB. -John

    #25 – Cleveland Browns: DE Takkarist McKinley, UCLA

    Actual Selection: S Jabrill Peppers, Michigan

    McKinley was actually picked #26

    In this re-draft, Takk McKinley goes one spot ahead of where he was originally drafted. He’s been a solid player for the Falcons, proving to be a specialist rushing the passer. He played all 16 games his rookie season, and while he didn’t start any, he’s progressed into a starting role having started 13 of 14 games played in 2019. He followed up seasons of 6 and 7 sacks, with a 3.5 sack campaign in 2019, but was a top 25 player in pressure rate among all defensive linemen. -Nathan

    #26 – Atlanta Falcons: CB Shaquill Griffin, UCF

    Actual Selection: DE Takkarist McKinley, UCLA

    Griffin was actually picked #90

    McKinley has been a decent player for the Falcons, but he goes just ahead of this spot in our re-draft. Shaquill Griffin has fit in perfectly in the Seahawks’ Cover 3 scheme as their left cornerback. Seattle initially traded out of this spot for the Falcons to move up and take McKinley, so if they had the chance again, they may have stayed put and just taken Griffin here themselves. The Falcons have had multiple injuries to their secondary in recent years, though, and he could help with Atlanta’s recent loss of Desmond Trufant. Griffin’s 13 passes defensed in 2019 were good for 4th in the NFL. -John

    #27 – Buffalo Bills: LB Haason Reddick, Temple

    Actual Selection: CB Tre’Davious White, LSU

    Reddick was actually picked #13

    While Hasson Reddick hasn’t played up to his original draft position, having been selected 13th overall, he’s been a decent contributor for the Cardinals. At  No. 27, the Bills, who have desperately been looking for off-ball linebacker help, take Reddick to fill that void. Reddick has played in all 48 games for the Cardinals, and after his rookie season in which he had to make the switch from edge rusher, which he played in college, to off-ball linebacker, he’s amassed over 150 tackles the past two seasons and now seems to be more comfortable in his role. -Nathan

    #28 – Dallas Cowboys: WR Cooper Kupp, Eastern Washington

    Actual Selection: DE Taco Charlton, Michigan

    Kupp was actually picked #69

    Dallas has been searching for more weapons for Dak Prescott since he took over the position, and Cooper Kupp would have been a great fit at this spot. The 2017 draft was nearing the tail end of Dez Bryant’s tenure and a year before the team traded a first round pick for Amari Cooper. 

    Somewhat understatedly, Kupp has proven to be at the very least an elite No. 2 option in the NFL. But in his return from a late season torn ACL, his 2019 catches, yards and touchdowns were all higher than his Rams teammate Robert Woods, and Amari Cooper only bested him in yards by 28, maybe suggesting he’d be more of the 1A to their 1Bs. A “Cooper-Kupp” pairing would make for a top tier receiving tandem. -John

    #29 – Cleveland Browns: RB Aaron Jones, UTEP

    Actual Selection: TE David Njoku, Miami FL

    Jones was actually picked #182

    The Browns were looking for playmakers at every position in 2017. With the last of their three picks in the first round, they turn to UTEP RB Aaron Jones. Jones has clearly outplayed his draft position and it’s easy to see why. After putting up a pedestrian 448 yards and 4 touchdowns on 81 carries as a depth player his rookie season, he’s since seen his playing time and numbers increase and vault him into the clear-cut starter. 

    In 2018, he rushed for 728 yards and 8 touchdowns before totaling over 1,000 yards and tied for a league-leading 16 rushing touchdowns this past season. He also added 49 receptions for nearly 500 yards through the air. In 2019, Jones ranked 4th in Total Points among RBs and was a top 10 performer in Positive Play rate as a rusher among backs with at least 150 carries. -Nathan

    #30 – Pittsburgh Steelers: QB/ATH Taysom Hill, BYU

    Actual Selection: LB T.J. Watt, Wisconsin

    Hill was undrafted

    The Steelers took a Defensive Player of the Year candidate in this spot in 2017, but Watt is long gone in this exercise. So too is Juju Smith-Schuster. Pittsburgh was coming off a Conference Championship loss, and the “Killer B’s” of Ben Roethlisberger, Le’Veon Bell and Antonio Brown were thriving. However, their work loads were astronomical, and an injury to any of the three would have been detrimental. Why not add the most versatile offensive threat in the game today? 

    The Steelers would use Bell in some Wildcat packages, which Taysom Hill could fulfill at the very least. He could spell Big Ben at quarterback on occasion, and potentially provide a long term replacement option like he may have for Drew Brees, a similarly aging QB. And he had 6 receiving touchdowns in 2019 as a surprisingly proficient downfield weapon for New Orleans.

    In his career, Hill has played 22% of his snaps at QB, 36% as a TE, and 33% at WR, while also logging over 800 special teams reps. Mike Tomlin would find a way to get him on the field, just as Sean Payton has. -John

    #31 – San Francisco 49ers: CB Adoree’ Jackson, USC

    Actual Selection: LB Rueben Foster, Alabama

    Jackson was actually picked #18

    Adoree’ Jackson has definitely not lived up to his original draft destination at No. 18, but the back end of the first round at No. 31 makes it a little easier to swallow. Obviously he’s an incredible athlete, but he’s struggled transitioning from the college ranks to the pro-level.

    However, there is a bright side. After being targeted 100 or more times his first two years in the league with solid success, he was only targeted 41 times in 2019. Additionally, his QBR Against has dropped each season from 91.1 in 2017 to 79.1 in 2019. He’s also a dynamic return man, having piled up over 1,000 yards in his career as a punt and kick returner. -Nathan

    #32 – New Orleans Saints: RB Austin Ekeler, Western State

    Actual Selection: T Ryan Ramczyk, Wisconsin

    Ekeler was actually undrafted

    With Alvin Kamara gone, the Saints would be looking for a player to fill a similar role in their offense. Austin Ekeler put up All-Pro-type numbers in 2019, as he compiled 92 receptions for almost 1000 yards (nearly all of which were after the catch) and 8 receiving touchdowns, on top of having the 3rd highest Broken Tackle% among RBs with at least 50 carries. With numerous other notable running backs still on this re-draft board (Mixon, Fournette, Hunt, Conner, and Breida to name a few), the undrafted Ekeler may be growing into the best of that group and would be a perfect fit in the Saints’ Reggie Bush/Darren Sproles/Alvin Kamara role. -John

    But what about …

    The original selections at picks 2 through 5 fall out of the first round in this re-draft, and it’s not hard to see why. 

    Mitchell Trubisky has been incredibly unstable at the Quarterback position for the Bears, and while he likely goes in the 2nd round to a quarterback-needy team in a redo, his 48-29 TD-INT ratio and 3.9% turnover-worthy throw rate are a cause for concern. 

    Solomon Thomas has yet to find his rhythm with only 6 career sacks. Although Fournette ran wild in the 2017 playoffs and had a decent 2019 with over 1,150 yards, he’s been injury prone and has barely averaged 4 yards per carry. 

    Finally, Corey Davis has been inconsistent for the Titans and while much of that blame can be placed on new Las Vegas Raiders Quarterback Marcus Mariota for most of his career, he still needs to show more to prove he’s a first-round worthy receiver.

    Three years is about the general timeline in which you can begin to see if your draft picks will work out or are busts. While half of the original first rounders fell out of the first round in this re-draft, we see many players that were selected outside of Day 1 that have proven to be valuable commodities for their respective teams. 

    As we approach the 2020 NFL Draft, it’s a given that a handful of first round picks won’t live up to their draft position, while other late-round selections will outplay theirs. Looking back three years is a good way to see how teams have drafted: if they are hitting on those early round selections and finding some gems in the later rounds or if they are missing early and failing to find key role players late. 

    The New Orleans Saints, for example, found themselves with four of the players taken in this re-draft in 2017, and the Pittsburgh Steelers originally selected two of our first five overall picks. Find the teams that consistently hit early and find gems late and you’ll likely be looking at the teams that are playing in January and February.

  • Who are the best “Day 2 WR” in the NFL Draft?

    By JOHN SHIRLEY

    The Colts and Steelers were in unfamiliar territory last season. They were both attempting to rally behind an unproven quarterback, after losing their projected starters unexpectedly. After having matching circumstances and similar results in 2019, the two teams find themselves paralleling each other again heading into the 2020 Draft.

    Both teams have traded away their first round pick for defensive help and both need a boost at receiver to help an aging quarterback from the legendary 2004 draft class. Based on SIS’s Total Points metric, only the Eagles currently have a worse receiving corps than the Colts and Steelers.

    Current WR Corps Rankings by 2019 Total Points

    RankTeamWR Total Points
    32Eagles21
    31Colts25
    30Steelers26

    The good news for the Colts and Steelers is that the upcoming NFL Draft is loaded with premier talent at the wide receiver position. While they won’t be in play for the class’s headliners, they will still have high-level players to choose from when they select at 34 and 49, respectively.   

    Colts

    Colts Projected Top 3 WR’s 2019 Stats

    PlayerTgtsCatch%ADoTYAC/RecSlot%Total Points
    Zach Pascal7356%11.75.853%17
    T.Y. Hilton6965%9.94.937.5%9
    Parris Campbell2572%8.06.057%0

    The Colts returning receivers should be better this season if they can stay healthy, as they lost significant time from both T.Y. Hilton and Parris Campbell last season. But, they could still use some help at the position. A deep threat with a large catch radius would be a welcome addition, as Zach Pascal’s team leading ADoT of 11.7 only ranked 55th among receivers with at least 20 targets. New quarterback Philip Rivers is used to getting a lot of help from his receivers

    Potential Targets:

    Tee Higgins, Clemson (SIS Football Rookie Handbook Grade: 6.7)

    • Scouts Take: Higgins has the natural hands, contested-catch ability, and wide catch radius to be a solid No. 2 at the next level, but his rounded cuts and inability to consistently separate against press may hold him back. – Nathan Cooper

    Jalen Reagor, TCU (SIS Football Rookie Handbook Grade: 6.8)

    • Scouts Take: Reagor has the speed, playmaking ability, quickness in and out of routes, and strong hands to be a consistent contributor in the NFL, but will need to win more against physical DB’s and learn an NFL route tree to take his game to the next level. – Nathan Cooper & Matt Johnston. (video analysis here)

    Denzel Mims, Baylor (SIS Football Rookie Handbook Grade: 6.4)

    • Mims is a very athletic, physical wide receiver who is an asset in all areas of the field with a wide catch radius and good blocking ability, but needs to improve his route running and become more consistent in traffic to become a better overall player. – Evan Butler

    Steelers

    Steelers Projected Top 3 WR’s 2019 Stats

    PlayerTgtsCatch%ADoTYAC/RecSlot%Total Points
    Diontae Johnson9165%9.15.224%15
    James Washington7856%15.24.640%13
    JuJu Smith-Schuster7258%9.25.871%-1

    The Steelers receiving corp took a major step back last season due to multiple reasons. The absence of a starting caliber quarterback, after Ben Roethlisberger’s injury, definitely lowered the group’s potential, as did JuJu Smith-Schuster being miscast as a No. 1 receiver.

    The good news for the Steelers is that with Smith-Schuster in the slot, James Washington emerging as a legitimate deep threat, and Diontae Johnson surprising as a third-round pick, they should have some solid pieces this year. Though, they could use some added size on the outside to complement the returning weapons. 

    Potential Targets:

    Laviska Shenault Jr., Colorado (SIS Football Rookie Handbook Grade: 6.8)

    • Shenault is a big-bodied, versatile receiver who wins at the point of attack and has a fierce, competitive attitude, but brings limited play speed and needs to refine his route running before he can become a star. – Cyril Penn

    Grabriel Davis, UCF (SIS Football Rookie Handbook Grade: 6.7)

    • Davis has the tracking, vertical separation, playmaking ability, and physical gifts to be a solid starter in the NFL, but he will need to show more after the catch and learn to run a more diverse route tree to become the complete package. – Alex O’Brian

    Michael Pittman Jr, USC (SIS Football Rookie Handbook Grade: 6.4)

    • Pittman Jr. will succeed in the NFL with his ability to high-point and body-up secondary defenders, but his lack of quickness and lateral athleticism should keep him from becoming a true No. 1 target. – Steve Chang & John Todd

    The 2020 Football Rookie Handbook is available for $15 from ACTASports.com. If you liked this article and like studying the NFL Draft, you’ll surely enjoy the book.

  • Introducing the Total Points System to College Football

    The following is an excerpt from the 2020 SIS Football Rookie Handbook, your guide to this year’s NFL Draft prospects. In the book, we took the Total Points player valuation system we used to evaluate NFL players and put it to use to evaluate college football players, with an emphasis on this year’s draft class. The book is on sale for $15 at ACTASports.com.

    By ALEX VIGDERMAN

    Initially released at the start of the 2018 NFL season, the Total Points system is Sports Info Solutions’ answer to the conundrum of evaluating players at any position using a single framework. Total Points starts by apportioning the Expected Points Added of a play to the different players involved, but also uses the wealth of charting data collected by SIS to adjust as the events of the play dictate.

    For example, take two incomplete passes, which for all intents and purposes are considered equal by most metrics, but would give very different Total Points values (for the quarterback in particular, but to some extent for many players).

    Play 1: On 3rd-and-8, the quarterback drops back to pass and is forced out of the pocket because the left guard blows a block. He throws it to his tight end right at the sticks, but he drops the pass.

    On this play, the left guard is penalized for having blown a block, and the quarterback and intended receiver recoup that value because their job is made more difficult. The throw is on-target and in the hands of the receiver, so the quarterback is credited as though it were completed. The receiver loses a whole bunch of value, especially because the play would have resulted in a third down conversion.

    Play 2: On 1st-and-10, the quarterback drops back to pass and throws a slant eight yards downfield to the tight end, but the throw sails way over the head of the intended receiver.

    Here not only does the down-and-distance affect the value available to the players (the incompletion isn’t as damaging in this case), but the effective blocking by the offensive line and the off-target throw cause the quarterback to take most of the blame for the play’s failure. The offensive line and intended receiver don’t lose any value because (as far as the charting data on the play is concerned) they did their jobs effectively.

    All 22 players on the field are evaluated in this way using a breadth of charting data, and the set of data being used is expanding each year as SIS adds new data points.

    The result of this calculation is a raw Points Above Average value that centers around zero for each season. From there, that value is transformed into Total Points by re-scaling it to center each team’s game-level total around the average points per game instead of around zero.

    FBS Total Points Leaders

    Following are the leaders in Total Points from the 2019 college football season. Unsurprisingly, quarterbacks dominate the list of the most valuable players. As a result, there are three leaderboards: the top quarterbacks, the top non-quarterback offensive players, and the top defensive players.

    Top FBS Players by Total Points, 2019

    Quarterbacks

    Player School Total Points
    Joe Burrow LSU 252
    Anthony Gordon Washington State 180
    Justin Fields Ohio State 170
    Jalen Hurts Oklahoma 162
    Sam Howell North Carolina 153

     

                                                     Non-Quarterback Offense
    Player Pos School Total Points
    Travis Etienne RB Clemson 84
    Clyde Edwards-Helaire RB LSU 83
    Zack Moss RB Utah 80
    Jonathan Taylor RB Wisconsin 72
    J.K. Dobbins RB Ohio State 71
    Kennedy Brooks RB Oklahoma 65
    Ja’Marr Chase WR LSU 62
    Javian Hawkins RB Louisville 60
    Najee Harris RB Alabama 60
    Jaret Patterson RB Buffalo 58

     

                                                                Defense
    Player Pos School Total Points
    Isaiah Simmons LB Clemson 76
    Chris Orr LB Wisconsin 74
    Antoine Winfield Jr. S Minnesota 74
    Nick Bolton LB Missouri 68
    James Lynch DT Baylor 67
    Xavier McKinney S Alabama 67
    Derek Stingley Jr. CB LSU 66
    Alijah Halliburton S Wyoming 65
    Kyahya Tezino LB San Diego State 65
    Joseph Ossai LB Texas 65
    Akileis Leroy LB Florida Atlantic 65

    Adjusting for Strength of Opponent

    Much more than is the case in the NFL, the spread of talent across teams in college matters a lot in how we must evaluate a player’s performance. To address this concern within Total Points, a team quality estimate is calculated for both sides of the ball, and then each play is modified using a multiplier that is based on the quality of the unit on the other side of the field.

    This adjustment (done the same way for offense or defense) is calculated over a rolling twelve-week window for each team by combining multiple calculations, all based on Expected Points Added per game (EPA/G):

    • EPAt: The team’s average EPA per game in the 12-week sample
    • EPAo: Their opponents’ performance in the other games in the sample (i.e. excluding games against the original team)
    • EPAoo: Their opponents’ opponents’ performance in the other games in the sample (i.e. excluding games against both the original team and their opponents)
    • EPAavg: The overall average EPA per game

    Each team’s (offensive and defensive) quality rating is based on its EPA per game compared to average, adjusted for strength of schedule. It is calculated by comparing each team’s opponents’ performance (EPAo) to their opponents’ allowances in other games (EPAoo), and then using that to modify the team’s EPA per game (EPAt). Finally, the average EPA per game across all teams (EPAavg) is subtracted out.

    Put mathematically,

    Team Rating = EPAt – (EPAo – EPAoo) – EPAavg.

    From there, the team rating is turned into a multiplier by converting the EPA difference calculated above into a percentage of the average EPA available in a game (i.e. the absolute value of all EPA accumulated in a game on average). The adjustment will range from about a 25% downgrade (e.g. a defensive player facing the Akron or UMass offense) to about a 25% upgrade (e.g. a defensive player facing the Ohio State offense).

    Example Use Cases for Total Points at the College Level

    Total Points is incredibly useful as a quick way to measure players against each other because it distills player value into a single number. This is especially true for defensive players, because it’s not clear how one should compare a tackle in the run game to a sack or a pass defensed, for example. Total Points allows us to discuss players with different roles and statistical profiles apples-to-apples.

    With the strength-of-schedule adjustment added on top of the existing Total Points methodology we can quickly evaluate a player compared to the full swath of college football players, which can help point scouting staffs in the direction of players whose raw statistics don’t tell the full story (for better or for worse).

    One such comparison could be drawn between running backs Zack Moss of Utah and Chuba Hubbard of Oklahoma State. Moss nearly leads the position in Total Points despite only ranking 11th in yards from scrimmage, buoyed by strong performances against above-average defenses. Hubbard, the leader in yards from scrimmage, doesn’t even crack the leaderboard above in part because of a weak set of opposing defenses and in part due to a handful of fumbles and pedestrian output after contact.

    Exploring Total Points Further

    This edition of The SIS Football Rookie Handbook represents the initial release of these Total Points numbers. You can find them in the Deep Dive section of the player pages as well as the leaderboards for each position.

    The Football Rookie Handbook is on sale for $15 at ACTASports.com

  • Two NFL prop possibilities supported by data

    By Steve Schwarz

    It’s April and there is no baseball. There are no NBA playoffs. There are no NHL playoffs. And the NFL doesn’t start its regular season until September. But because the NFL has stuck to their pre-Coronavirus schedule, we will have an NFL Draft at the end of April.

    OK, it won’t be in front of the usual wild crowds of fans that were expected to swarm over Las Vegas. We won’t get to hear the cheering and jeering of picks, because it will be a “Virtual Draft.” Instead we will see computer hookups between the GMs of the 32 teams and NFL headquarters (I’d like to have the “over” on technical issues, but that’s another story). At least we will have something interesting to watch for three days starting on April 23.

    And thanks to legalized betting in various places around the country, we can bet on the selections. Sure, it’s not like betting on LeBron James and the Lakers against the crosstown Clippers in a playoff series, but it can still be fun … and profitable.

    At the end of the piece you can find a few of the more interesting prop bets from William Hill odds. Let’s see if we can find some profit in those odds. Here are two options supported by SIS data:

    Jordan Love, Utah State, pick 15.5, over -110.

    While Joe Burrow, Tua Tagovailoa and Justin Hebert figure to go to quarterback-needy teams right out of the box, there is no way, based on last season’s statistics, that Love should be anywhere near the top-15 picks.

    Using SIS data in the chart below, Love’s performance last season wasn’t anywhere near elite. In fact, his IQR rating was well below the top-100 quarterbacks for the 2019 season. Anyone selecting Love is doing it based on perceived potential and that usually gets coaches/GMs fired.

    Even assuming a team takes him as a project, No. 15 is far too early. You will only have to sweat out the first Jacksonville pick (currently Gardner Minshew is their starter), but the Jaguars have two first-round selections (9, 20) and if they reach for a quarterback it would likely be with the second pick (the one they got from the Los Angeles Rams for Jalen Ramsey). The Patriots might also be interested, but they are No. 23 and Bill Belichick usually trades down, not up.

    Player College IQR Yards TDs INT
    Tua Tagovailoa Alabama 146.6 2,840 33 3
    Joe Burrow LSU 144.5 5,671 60 6
    Justin Herbert Oregon 117.4 3,471 32 6
    Jordan Love Utah State 81.3 3,405 20 17

    Justin Jefferson, LSU, pick 23.5, under -110.

    Based on most expert mock drafts, three mid-draft teams are expected to go for wide receivers; San Francisco, Oakland and Denver. So by the No. 15 pick, the top-three options will be off the board. And the team who most needs a wideout is Philadelphia (No. 21). Jefferson is a perfect fit for the Eagles. Jefferson ranked No. 1 among all Power-5 receivers from a statistical perspective. Add in his 4.43 40-yard dash, 37.5 inch vertical at the combine, and Jefferson’s work in a pro-style offense and the LSU wideout has everything a team could want.

    Player College WR Rating Catchable Targets Catches Yards TDs
    Justin Jefferson LSU 147.9 121 111 1,540 18
    Henry Ruggs III Alabama 146.8 44 40 746 7
    CeeDee Lamb Oklahoma 144.8 73 62 1,327 14
    Tee Higgins Clemson 138.6 75 59 1,167 13
    Jerry Jeudy Alabama 127.2 86 77 1,163 10

    Sports Info Solutions has been an innovator in the collection and analysis of sports data for almost two decades. SIS specializes in baseball and football data, using professional scouting practices to collect the most detailed and accurate information in both sports. Their data can be found in the majority of team front offices, and on websites such as Fangraphs and Football Outsiders.

    Various 2020 NFL Draft Prop Bet Odds

    Player (WR) College Draft Spot Over Under
    Jerry Jeudy Alabama 12.5 125 -145
    CeeDee Lamb Oklahoma 12.5 -110 -110
    Henry Ruggs III Alabama 14.5 even -120
    Justin Jefferson LSU 23.5 -110 -110
    Tee Higgins Clemson 32.5 -110 -110
    Player (OL) College Draft Spot Over Under
    Mekhi Becton Louisville 7.5 -130 110
    Tristan Wirfs Iowa 8.5  120 -140
    Jedrick Wills Alabama 9.5 -145 125
    Anthony Thomas Georgia 12.5 -120 even
    Player (QB) College Draft Spot Over Under
    Tua Tagovailoa Alabama 3.5 -110 -110
    Justin Herbert Oregon 6.0 120 -140
    Jordan Love Utah State 15.5 -110 -110
    Player (RB) College Draft Spot Over Under
    D’Andre Swift Georgia 31.5 -110 -110
    Jonathan Taylor Wisconsin 36.5 -110 -110
    Player (LB) College Draft Spot Over Under
    Isaiah Simmons Clemson 6.5 105 -125
    Kenneth Murray Oklahoma 24.5 -110 -110
    Patrick Queen LSU 24.5 -110 -110