Month: October 2019

  • How Good Is the Patriots’ Defense, Really?

    By Brian Reiff

    The Patriots are again one of the NFL’s top teams. Not something that’s surprising to anyone, but the way in which they’re doing it has made headlines.

    The Patriots’ defense has been other-worldly this season, ranking first by an assortment of metrics: points allowed, yards per play, total yards allowed (among teams that have played six games), turnovers forced, Adjusted Net Yards per Attempt (ANY/A), and pretty much any other stat you can find on Pro-Football Reference. In fact, the Patriots are so good that they’re actually forcing turnovers on a higher percentage of drives (20%) than they’re allowing the opposing team to score (6%).

    Even when looking at more advanced metrics, the Patriots still come out on top. A good way to measure performance is through Expected Points, specifically looking at Expected Points Added (EPA) per 60 plays. By this metric, the Patriots have still been the top defense, but their gap at the top is narrower than some might’ve thought.

    2019 EPA Allowed Per 60 Plays Leaders

    TeamEPA Allowed Per 60 Plays
    Patriots-22.2
    49ers-19.8
    Bills-9.6
    Titans-6.0
    Vikings-5.4

    A negative number here is good for the defense, indicating the offense was losing an average of 22.2 Expected Points every time they ran a game’s worth of plays against the Patriots defense. However, the 49ers are right there with them, with both enjoying a large lead over the rest of the league.

    However, there is still a notable factor being left out of this analysis. The Patriots have played one of the easiest schedules in the league, feasting on the likes of the Steelers (2-4), Dolphins (0-5), Jets (1-4), Redskins (1-5) and Giants (2-4). Has their defense actually been as good as the number show, or have they just played bad teams that have inflated their numbers?

    To determine this, we can look at what the Patriots’ opponents have done in their games against teams other than the Patriots.

    For example, the Jets averaged -28.8 EPA per 60 plays against the Patriots, but they’ve averaged -15.0 EPA per 60 plays in the rest of their games against the Bills, Browns, Eagles and Cowboys. With those numbers, we could say that the Patriots were 13.8 points better than an “average” team was against the Jets (the Jets have likely not played an exactly “average” schedule, but in the aggregate among all teams it should be close enough).

    All of the Patriots’ opponents this season have combined to average -5.4 EPA per 60 plays in their games against teams that weren’t the Patriots, which ends up being the second-lowest mark by a team (the Cowboys’ opponents have averaged -7.2 EPA per 60 plays). If we take the Patriots’ overall number (-22.2) and compare it against their opponents’ average (-5.4), we see that the Patriots’ defense was 16.8 points better than an average team. Doing this for all teams, we can produce an opponent-adjusted leaderboard that should provide a better answer to the question of which defense has reigned supreme in the NFL so far this season.

    2019 EPA Allowed Per 60 Plays Leaders
    Adjusted for Opponent

    TeamEPA Allowed Per 60 PlaysOpponent Avg EPA Per 60 PlaysDiff
    49ers-19.8-1.8-18.0
    Patriots-22.2-5.4-16.8
    Panthers-5.43.6-9.0
    Titans-6.01.8-7.8
    Steelers-4.23.0-7.2

    Three of the top five teams remain the same, but there is a new leader—the San Francisco 49ers. After adjusting for the teams they’ve played, the 49ers have actually stifled their opponents more so than the Patriots, despite trailing behind them in the raw numbers (albeit slightly). The Patriots are a close second, so it’d be improper to say their defense hasn’t been great. However, it’s clear that the two teams comprise a top-two rather than the Patriots sitting alone at the top.

    For more advanced NFL stats, visit the SIS DataHub and for more information about Sports Info Solutions, visit our website.

  • Top prop bets for Chiefs-Broncos

    By Steve Schwartz

    Here are the top prop bets for Thursday night’s game between the Chiefs and Broncos based on analysis using SISBets.com, our sports props analysis tool (register to use and receive 10 free queries).

    All odds come from ParxCasino.com

    Overall record: 8-8. Last week: 1-3

    1) LeSean McCoy, 2.5 receptions, under -195.

    McCoy has been a great receiving back over his career with 488 receptions, but in 2019 he’s in a shared running back situation and hasn’t caught more than two balls in a game since Week 3. The Chiefs simply have too many options now that Tyreek Hill and Damien Williams are back in the lineup. Our data says the under should be -600, but it’s currently at -195.

    2) Courtland Sutton, 4.5 receptions, over -104.

    A second-round pick of the Broncos in 2018, Sutton has already become the team’s No. 1 wide receiver with 46 targets, 30 catches, 477 yards and three touchdown catches. That’s an average of almost eight targets and five receptions per game. The Chiefs pass defense is ranked in the bottom half. At -104 that’s a steal based on our data which puts a fair market value at -278.

    3) Travis Kelce, 6.5 receptions, under -150.

    Kelce does lead Kansas City in targets (49) and receptions (32), but the Chiefs passing game has been out-of-sync the past two games and the All-Pro tight end has caught just four balls in each of those games. The Broncos have allowed 28 receptions to tight ends in six games. SIS analysis predicts 5.2 receptions and a fair number should be -274, so it’s a bargain at -150.

    4) Royce Freeman, 2.5 receptions, over -195.

    Phillip Lindsay is getting all the media attention, but Freeman is getting 44-percent of the rushing attempts and just under 50-percent of the running back receiving targets. With 21 receptions over six games he’s averaging 3.5 catches per game, including at least four balls in four of the last five. He’s a big favorite to go over, but not as big as he should be, at -195. Fair market value should be -320.

    Sports Info Solutions has been an innovator in the collection and analysis of sports data for almost two decades. SIS specializes in baseball and football data, using professional scouting practices to collect the most detailed and accurate information in both sports. Their data can be found in the majority of team front offices, and on websites such as Fangraphs and Football Outsiders.

    Other props

    Quarterback Touchdown Passes

    ——————————————

    Patrick Mahomes, 1.5, over -190/under +150

    Joe Flacco, 1.5, over -124/under -155

     

    Quarterback Interceptions

    ———————————–

    Patrick Mahomes, 0.5, over -121/under -104

    Joe Flacco, 0.5, over -143/under +115

     

    Quarterback Completions

    ———————————-

    Patrick Mahomes, 23.5 completions, over -124/under 100

    Joe Flacco, 21.5 completions, over -118/under -106

     

    Touchdown Scorers

    ————————–

    Kansas City –

    Travis Kelce +110
    Tyreek Hill +110
    LeSean McCoy +135
    Sammy Watkins +240
    Damien Williams +250
    Mecole Hardman +285
    Demarcus Robinson +350
    Byron Pringle +450
    Patrick Mahomes +600
    Darrel Williams +650
    De’Anthony Thomas +750

     

    Denver –

    Phillip Lindsay +100
    Courtland Sutton +150
    Royce Freeman +160
    Emmanuel Sanders +225
    Noah Fant +260
    DaeSean Hamilton +400
    Jeff Heuerman +1000
    Joe Flacco +1000
    Fred Brown +1000

     

    Total Receptions

    ———————-

    Kansas City –

    LeSean McCoy 2.5, over +153/under -195

    Tyreek Hill, 5.5, over +120/under -150

    Travis Kelce, 6.5, over +120/under -150

     

    Denver –

    Phillip Lindsay, 2.5, over -195/under +153

    Royce Freeman, 2.5, over -195/under +153

    Noah Fant, 2.5, over +120/under -150

    Emmanuel Sanders, 3.5, over -148/under +118

  • Scouting the future: Japan’s top players who may get posted down the road

    By Will Hoefer

    At SIS, part of our baseball operation involves collecting data on all of the Nippon Professional Baseball (NPB) games. We’ll be sharing detailed profiles on a player from each of these teams. This piece, the last in our series, focuses on players who could be posted in future years.

    Part I – Position Players

    Part II – Pitchers

    Kohei Arihara, RHP, Nippon-Ham

    Age: 27 | Posting Eligibility: 2021

    Kohei Arihara has long been on the radar of Pacific Rim scouts, due in no small part to his rotation mate Shohei Ohtani drawing massive interest during his first three seasons as a pro. Nevertheless, Arihara has maintained the interest of MLB scouts well after the departure of Ohtani. The 27 year old right hander has ascended to ace status for the Fighters, and has enjoyed a breakout season on the strength of increased changeup usage that allows him to fare much better against left handed hitters. His 25.2 K% and 2.46 ERA this season are by far career highs, and it was encouraging to see him get to 160 innings pitched after a shoulder injury prior to the 2018 season limited him to 110 innings.

    Arihara features a four seamer with decent run and rise as his primary fastball, which will range anywhere from 88 to 95 MPH in a given start. It’s hard to get a great gauge of where he sits with, but his ability to maintain most of the higher range of his velocity late into games suggests he likes to mix speeds rather than try to blow hitters away.

    Against right handed hitters, Arihara goes to his slider and splitter to finish off plate appearances. The slider is his primary breaking ball, and an above-average offering with nice bite that is commanded well gloveside to the black. The splitter features good slashing movement that can get down and in on the shoetops of righties, but it can leak over the plate at times and projects more as an average offering.

    Against left handed batters, Arihara likes to go to his changeup and cutter. The cutter, which has been used less in recent years, is an average offering that Arihara can locate fairly well on the hands of lefties and generate weak contact. The changeup is the one true plus offering that Arihara features, as he demonstrates plus depth and fade with more consistent feel than the splitter. Rounding out his repertoire is a mid to high 80s two seamer that will likely be scrapped at the next level, along with an eephus curve that serves as a change of pace pitch.

    With only being a year away from that all too valuable sixth year of NPB service time, don’t expect Kohei Arihara to be posted until after the 2020 season. He has grown into his wide arsenal of offerings, and seems to have found a pitch mix that best suits him as a starter. Arihara demonstrates strong command of his three best pitches–an above average four seamer, a plus change, and a slider that flashes plus. That, along with his resourceful deployment of his lesser secondary offerings to keep hitters off balance, projects Arihara as a middle of the rotation starter for an MLB team as soon as 2021.

     

    Kohei Arihara W L IP ERA WHIP HR/9 K% BB%
    2019 15 8 164.1 2.46 0.92 0.8 25.2% 6.3%
    Career 52 41 703.1 3.79 1.22 1.0 17.8% 5.6%

    Masataka Yoshida, OF, Orix

    Age: 26 | Posting Eligibility: 2023

    The shining star in an otherwise bleak Orix sky, Masataka Yoshida is one of the best pure hitters in the NPB. He’s had back to back 25-home run seasons, is one of three qualified hitters to walk more than he struck out in 2019, and has been consistently among the leaders in OPS throughout his NPB career. The only thing Yoshida doesn’t do is run–he’s 9 for 14 in career stolen base attempts–but there are few better inside the batter’s box than this Buffaloes’ basher.

    Yoshida exhibits plus bat speed and plus raw power from the left side, with quiet lower half swing mechanics. His load gets a little long due to a hand hitch keeps him from getting out in front of the ball more on high velocity pitches, but he still has the hand quickness and feel for hitting to spray consistently and drive those pitches up the middle. Being able to get out in front and drive those balls pull side with some regularity is the next step. Defensively, Yoshida is limited to left field, as he has fringe average arm strength and foot speed. He moves very tentatively in the field and doesn’t seem to get good reads on fly balls, which projects him to have below average range.

    Yoshida’s power relative to his size, feel for hitting from the left side, and fringy defensive ability reminds me a lot of Texas Rangers’ DH/LF Willie Calhoun–whose offensive breakout in 2019 shows promise for Yoshida getting an offer to play everyday as a middle of the order masher. Due to a lower back injury that sidelined him for most of 2017, Yoshida is likely not going to gain the requisite six years of service time required to eligible for a major league contract in the posting process until after the 2022 season. Considering his value is almost entirely tied to his bat, he should be able to retain his value over the next three seasons provided he stays healthy–though it remains to be seen if Orix will be willing to post their superstar.

    Masataka Yoshida PA AVG OBP SLG HR SB BB% K%
    2019 610 .322 .413 .543 29 5 13.0% 10.5%
    Career 1734 .315 .401 .535 77 9 12.2% 11.8%

    Atsuki Taneichi, RHP

    Chiba Lotte (Posting: 2026)

    R/R 6-00, 183 lbs

    Date of Birth: 09/07/1998

    NOTE: Due to Taneichi’s age, I’ve decided to take a more pure scouting report approach to his entry in the series. We’ll cover his frame, mechanics, each pitch and his overall command, along with overall thoughts and a long term projection.

    Fastball: 40 (50), Slider: 45 (55), Splitter: 55 (60), Command: 40 (50)

    Build and Mechanics: 6’0”, 183 lbs. Mostly filled out, might be able to add a bit more muscle to his frame. Pitches out of a three-quarter armslot, shows good arm speed and extension with smooth lower-half mechanics; though shortening up his arm action might help him get a bit more zip on his fastball.

    Fastball: Sits 88-91, Tops out at 92. Could probably add some muscle onto his frame, but the velo is going to be no better than average. Can get plus run on it and has shown effectiveness getting weak contact working up in the zone. Gets good rise on his 4-seamer and good sink on 2-seamer.

    Slider: Average pitch that flashes above average bite and depth. Think it should be used more as a change of pace against lefties but should be an out pitch against righties as he refines his command of it.

    Splitter: Plus depth and fade, shows advanced feel but can leak it over the middle. Demonstrates an ability to tunnel it off of sinker against lefties and slice it down against righties.

    Command: Secondary command is developing, showing some difficulty getting over the top of his slider. Both split and slider will miss over the plate, but motion is repeatable and fluid enough to project an increase in hitting spots.

    Overall: Taniechi has been impressive as a second year out of high school in the NPB. His upside is limited due to a fastball with a strong movement profile but lackluster velocity, but he has a splitter that projects as plus along with a slider that should be a reliable out pitch versus righties. Secondary command is still a work in progress, but he generally keeps his fastball out of the middle of the zone. Refinement of his slider will be key for him. If he can consistently get over the top of it he has bottom of rotation upside in an MLB rotation.

    Atsuki Taneichi W L IP ERA WHIP HR/9 K% BB%
    2019 8 2 116.2 3.24 1.41 0.8 26.7% 10.1%
    Career 8 6 155.0 3.95 1.42 0.9 24.1% 9.5%

     

  • SIS NFL Preview Week 6

    At Sports Info Solutions, our Video Scouts chart FBS and NFL football games 40 hours a week. They chart every play of every game in extraordinary detail, becoming experts in team’s tendencies and concepts. So, who better to ask about what to watch for in this weeks upcoming NFL games? This season we will be providing weekly NFL previews of key matchups with insight straight from our Video Scouts and stats from the SIS DataHub Pro.

    Philadelphia Eagles @ Minnesota Vikings – 10/13 1:00 PM ET

    Noah Gatsik, SIS Operations Associate:

    Historically, Kirk Cousins has played his best against the Philadelphia Eagles. In eight career games against them, he has thrown 17 TDs to 5 INTs. The Eagles are still very short handed in the secondary in a matchup that is very favorable for the Vikings on paper. Last year when these 2 teams played, Diggs and Thielen combined for 17 catches, 206 yards, and a TD (Thielen 116 Yards and 1 TD). Given the recent well-known struggles of the Vikings passing attack in 2019, this is likely their best opportunity to get the passing offense back on track and right the ship (pun intended).

    Vikings Top WR’s Performance 2019

     TargetsTotal Points EarnedWR Rank
    Adam Thielen301312
    Stefon Diggs23-1108

     

    Carolina Panthers @ Tampa Bay Buccaneers – 10/13 9:30 AM ET

    Britton Mann , SIS Football Video Scout:

    The Panthers are traveling overseas to London this week for a divisional matchup against the Buccaneers. Christian McCaffrey has helped lead the team to victories the last few games by being the workhorse. The formula does not change this week. McCaffrey’s versatility in the offense is what makes this group dangerous. He leads the league in yards from scrimmage and will need to continue his barrage of receptions and tough carries to extend the Panthers winning streak.

    Christian McCaffrey’s Performance 2019 by Week

    WeekCarriesRushing Points EarnedTargetsReceiving Points Earned
    1193.5112.4
    216-5.061.2
    3242.241.0
    4275.1103.7
    5190.895.8
    Total (RB Rank)105 (1)6.6 (18)40 (2)14.1 (1)

     

  • New NFL Podcast: Previews, Reviews, Injury Updates

    LISTEN HERE

    Former NFL scout Matt Manocherian (@mattmano) of Sports Info Solutions and football analytics pioneer Aaron Schatz (@FO_ASchatz) of Football Outsiders (@fboutsiders) look back at the most important games from last week: the Buccaneers at Saints (0:44), Ravens at Steelers (2:05) and Packers at Cowboys (2:56) and break down the biggest contests for the upcoming Week 6: Lions at Packers (7:10), Eagles and Vikings (11:57) and 49ers at Rams (15:13). Injury expert John Verros (@VerrosJohn) closes the show with updates on Chiefs QB Patrick Mahomes (24:10) and 49ers FB Kyle Juszczyk (26:21).

    You can email the show with feedback at offthecharts@ww2.sportsinfosolutions.com and don’t forget to follow on Twitter @SportsInfo_SIS and Instagram @sportsinfosolutions. For more, check out:  sportsinfosolutions.com footballoutsiders.com sportsinfosolutionsblog.com SISDataHub.com
    Read more at http://offthechartsfootball.libsyn.com/looking-ahead-to-nfl-week-6?tdest_id=789830#if5dlqf7iSL6cXTi.99

  • What are the top props in the Giants-Patriots game?

    By Steve Schwartz

    Using SISBets.com to evaluate the top prop bets for Thursday’s game between the New York Giants and New England Patriots (odds from ParxCasino.com.)

    Register at SISBets.com and receive 10 free queries of our prop evaluation tools. Also, be sure to try SISDataHub.com

     In this Thursday’s game, with the home New England Patriots favored by more than two touchdowns, a number of the prop bets on Patriots players could be affected by the expectation that they could be sitting in the fourth quarter. Therefore, most of the plays will be about the Giants who should be out there for the full 60 minutes.

    1) Daniel Jones, over 0.5 TD passes, -240.

    Daniel Jones has started three games and completed at least one touchdown pass in every game. And while the Patriots defense has been the best in the league, yielding a league-low 39 points including zero touchdown passes with 11 interceptions, the Giants figure to be playing from behind with a third-string running back and throwing for much of the game. Our data predicts he’ll throw close to 40 passes, and an interception or two, but the SISdata says he should be a -395 favorite to throw one or more touchdown passes and you are only giving -240.

    2) Daniel Jones, over 20.5 completions, -105.

    Just as Jones should throw 1.6 touchdown passes among his almost 40 attempts, the data shows he should complete 24.0 passes which is well above the required amount to win this prop bet. SISdata made a fair number at -312, but the line is just -105. There will be weather in the area around Gillette Stadium Thursday night and rain shouldn’t effect this one option, but be careful if the winds are gusting above 17-20 mph. If that’s the case you should bypass this play. Many times if teams are throwing into a strong wind they opt for a ground attack leaving the quarterback just two favorable quarters to reach his goal.

    3) Jonathan Hilliman, score TD, +325.

    If Saquon Barkley and Wayne Gallman are inactive as expected, Jonathan Hilliman will be the starter and workhorse. He should see around 14 rushing attempts and will obviously be the goal line rushing option as well. Our data shows fair market value should be +154, but he’s listed at +325 to score.

    4) James White, score TD, +230.

    If the weather is questionable as expected, the Pats offense usually goes to the short passing game which means Julian Edelman in the slot and James White out of the backfield. Over the past two games, White has reappeared as part of the offense seeing 19 targets and catching 14 of them. Against Washington in Week 4 he also had a season high six rushing attempts. Both men have favorable numbers, but White’s is slightly better with a chance to score either through the air or on the ground. SISdata analysis puts White at a +154, but the casino is offering a generous +230.

    Sports Info Solutions has been an innovator in the collection and analysis of sports data for almost two decades. SIS specializes in baseball and football data, using professional scouting practices to collect the most detailed and accurate information in both sports. Their data can be found in the majority of team front offices, and on websites such as Fangraphs and Football Outsiders.

    Quarterback Touchdown Passes

    ——————————————

    Daniel Jones, 0.5, over -240/under +185

    Tom Brady, 1.5, over -275/under +210

    Quarterback Interceptions

    ———————————–

    Daniel Jones, 0.5, over -250/under +194

    Tom Brady, 0.5, over +129/under -162

    Quarterback Completions

    ———————————-

    Daniel Jones, 20.5 completions, over -105/under -120

    Tom Brady, 24.5 completions, over +117/under -148

    Touchdown Scorers

    ————————–

    New York –

    Golden Tate, +300

    Jonathan Hilliman, +325

    Rhett Ellison, +550

    Darius Slayton, +450

    Elijhaa Penny, +500

    Daniel Jones, +600

    Cody Latimer, +800

    New England –

    Sony Michel, -162

    James White, +230

    Julian Edelman, +135

    Josh Gordon, +150

    Red Burkhead, +210

    Phillip Dorsett, +225

    Jacoby Meyers, +275

    Brandon Bolden, +350

    Matt LaCosse, +475

    Ryan Izzo, +550

    Tom Brady, +900

    Total Receptions

    ———————-

    New York –

    Golden Tate, 5.5, over +128/under -159

    Darius Slayton, 3.5, over +103/under -129

    New England –

    Julian Edelman, 5.5, -148/under +118

    Josh Gordon, 3.5, over -152/under +122

  • SIS NFL Preview Week 5

    At Sports Info Solutions, our Video Scouts chart FBS and NFL football games 40 hours a week. They chart every play of every game in extraordinary detail, becoming experts in team’s tendencies and concepts. So, who better to ask about what to watch for in this weeks upcoming NFL games? This season we will be providing weekly NFL previews of key matchups with insight straight from our Video Scouts and stats from the SIS DataHub Pro.

    New England Patriots @ Washington Redskins – 10/6 1:00 ET

    Stephen Marciello, SIS Football Video Scout:

    After giving up their first touchdown from scrimmage last week against the Bills, the Patriots defense will face the Redskins, who just named . LB Jamie Collins, who became an afterthought on the Cleveland Browns defense, has returned to the Patriots and become arguably the most versatile player on the roster. Collins played 100% of the defensive snaps last week, as well as over 70% of the special teams snaps. Collins already has a career high 3 interceptions, is nearing a career high with 3.5 sacks, and has scored a defensive touchdown.

    Jamie Collins’ Performance 2018 vs. 2019


    Season
    Pass Defense
    Total Points Saved
    Run Defense
    Total Points Saved
    Total Points SavedRank Among LB’s
    2018491298th
    2019187253rd

     

    Minnesota Vikings @ New York Giants – 10/6 1:00 ET

    Andrew McKeon, SIS Football Video Scout:

    While it was just against the lowly Redskins, the Giants defense has some momentum to carry over into week five against the Vikings. With Kirk Cousins’ struggles along with the coming out party of Dalvin Cook this season, expect the Giants to stack the box this week and play a lot of man coverage on the outside, leaving their DBs on islands, and forcing Cousins to beat them instead.

    Dalvin Cook vs. Giants Defense on Runs Into a Stacked Box

    PlayerAttemptsYds/AttYds After Contact / Att
    Dalvin Cook346.44.1
    Vs. Giants Defense342.31.4

     

    Buffalo Bills @ Tennessee Titans – 10/6 1:00 ET

    Kendall Mirsky, SIS Football Video Scout:

    Watch for Bills TE Dawson Knox this week with Patrick DiMarco possibly sidelined with a concussion. If DiMarco does not play, the Bills will be forced to decide if Knox has shown enough as a run blocker to be put in the backfield as a lead blocker in addition to his tight end duties. The Titans have a particularly strong secondary, so the Bills will want to keep the ball on the ground, especially if Josh Allen is not playing. If not, the Bills may have to avoid offensive play calls that require a lead blocker from the backfield. This could alter the game because of the Bills offensive consistency on the ground and inconsistencies in the passing game.

    Bills 2019 Rushing Success with and without a Lead Blocker

    Lead BlockerAttemptsEPA / Att
    No77-0.02
    Yes200.07

     

    Denver Broncos @ Los Angeles Chargers – 10/6 4:05 ET

    Will Osgood, SIS Football Video Scout:

    The Broncos have been struggling to get their pass rush going so far this season. Now with Bradley Chubb out for the season, look for Philip Rivers and the Chargers to drop back early and often, even though they have struggled some in pass protection. If the Chargers can keep Von Miller from wreaking havoc on his own, Keenan Allen should continue his electric start to the 2019 campaign.

     Keenan Allen’s 2019 Performance So Far

    PlayerTargetsYardsReceiving
    Total Points Earned
    Rank Among WR’s
    Keenan Allen4845220.62nd

     

    Cleveland Browns @ San Francisco 49ers – 10/7 8:15 ET

    Cyril Zachary Penn, SIS Football Video Scout:

    The 49ers rank ninth overall on offense by Positive% (the percentage of plays that result in a positive EPA). Yet, they’ve ran the second-fewest plays in the NFL, ahead of only the Jets. Keeping up that efficiency will be difficult on Monday night, as they square up with their toughest opponent thus far. But with two full weeks of preparation, Kyle Shanahan should have the offense humming. The 49ers have been successful by dominating with a wide-zone attack and hitting on wide-open play-action concepts. If he can dial up a few big plays against Cleveland, San Francisco could start 4-0 for the first time since 1990.

    Play-Action Success, 49ers Offense vs. Browns Defense

    TeamDropbacksYds / AttNFL Rank
    49ers Offense3310.97th
    Vs. Browns Defense4711.528th

     

  • Top prop bets for Rams-Seahawks

    By Steve Schwarz

    Thursday’s game doesn’t have any “bet-the-house” options, but we have found a number of variances between our numbers and the casino which could be exploited. Beware, however, the Thursday weather report for Seattle does include a chance for a few showers which could complicate things.

    A reminder that if you want to look at projections for any prop bet, you can try SISBets.com. Register for 10 free queries.

    1) Tyler Lockett, over 4.5 receptions, -134.

    Lockett has produced two double-digit reception days and even in a blowout win over Arizona last weekend caught four balls. He leads the Seahawks in targets, averaging eight per contest, and given his 81% catch-percentage in 2019 and his 81% catch percentage last season it’s reasonable to project the over. Our analysis predicts this at a -220 rate, but we are only paying -134.

    2) Jared Goff, under 24.5 completions, -112.

    Goff’s 45 completions on Sunday (in 68 attempts), shouldn’t scare you away from betting the under in this one. That was Tampa Bay and the Rams were playing from behind. This game against the Seahawks will be played like a playoff game with the winner getting the early upper hand in the division. In none of the first three games of the season, did Goff produce 25 completions and in the three playoff games to finish 2018 he averaged just 19.6 completions. Then add in the chance for a wet football and that adds to the likelihood of him finishing under. A fair price here should be -162, but its -112.

    3) Russell Wilson, under 21.5 completions, -112.

    Wilson has begun the season as hot as he’s ever been, but still he’s averaging just 24 completions per game against the likes of Cincinnati, Pittsburgh, New Orleans and Arizona. He’ll be facing the 2017 and 2018 Defensive Player of the Year in Aaron Donald. Before last Sunday’s failures the team was allowing just 16.3 points per game. A fair price should be -156, but the casino odds are just -112.

    4) Todd Gurley, score a touchdown, +105.

    Over his last 33 games, Gurley has scored 43 touchdowns (33 rushing, 10 receiving). That’s a pretty good sample size, including three in four games this season. He’s also scored nine times in seven career games against Seattle, yet he’s a slight underdog in this prop bet. SISdata analysis project that Gurley should be a -123 favorite here.

    Sports Info Solutions has been an innovator in the collection and analysis of sports data for almost two decades. SIS specializes in baseball and football data, using professional scouting practices to collect the most detailed and accurate information in both sports. Their data can be found in the majority of team front offices, and on websites such as Fangraphs and Football Outsiders.

     

    Quarterback Touchdown Passes

    ——————————————

    Jared Goff, 1.5, over -120/under -104

    Russell Wilson, 1.5, over -162/under +130

     

    Quarterback Interceptions

    ———————————–

    Jared Goff, 0.5, over -167/under +134

    Russell Wilson, 0.5, over +122/under -122

     

    Quarterback Completions

    ———————————-

    Jared Goff, 24.5 completions, over -112/under -112

    Russell Wilson, 21.5 completions, over -112/under -112

     

    Touchdown Scorers

    ————————–

    Seattle –

    Jaron Brown, +425

    Chris Carson, +110

    Will Dissly, +150

    Tyler Lockett, +105

    D.K. Metcalf, +150

    David Moore, +700

    Rashaad Penny, +375

    C.J. Prosise, +550

    Malik Turner, +800

    Russell Wilson, +350

     

    Los Angeles Rams –

    Malcolm Brown, +165

    Brandin Cooks, +200

    Gerald Everett, +375

    Jared Goff, +850

    Todd Gurley, +105

    Tyler Higbee, +425

    Cooper Kupp, +125

    Josh Reynolds, +800

    Robert Woods, +225

     

     

    Total Receptions

    ———————-

    Seattle –

    Chris Carson, 2.5, over 100/under -124

    Will Dissly, 4.5, over 120/under -150

    Tyler Lockett, 4.5, over -134/under +107

    D.K. Metcalf, 2.5, over -137/under +110

     

    Los Angeles Rams –

    Brandin Cooks, 4.5, -112/under -112

    Todd Gurley, 2.5, over -162/under +130

    Cooper Kupp, 6.5, over +120/under -150

    Robert Woods, 5.5, +110/under -137

  • Scouting some of Japan’s top potential MLB pitchers

    By Will Hoefer

    At SIS, part of our baseball operation involves collecting data on all of the Nippon Professional Baseball (NPB) games. We’ll be sharing detailed profiles on a player from each of these teams.

    Kodai Senga, RHP, Fukuoka SoftBank Hawks

    Age: 26 | Free Agency Eligibility: 2022 | Posting Eligible?: Yes

    Kodai Senga doesn’t just possess some of the best raw stuff in Japan, he possesses some of the best raw stuff in the world. The 26 year old righthander has been electric in 2019. He leads all qualified starters with a 20.4 K-BB%, and his 11.5 K/9 rate also tops the NPB rotation leaderboard. 

    Senga typically averaged around 92 MPH on his heater during his previous four years as staff ace of the Hawks, but has seen his average fastball velocity jump to around 95-96 MPH in 2019, and will touch 98 and 99 routinely in starts. He’s still adjusting to his newfound velocity, and will either need to improve his ability to hit the corners or start attacking the zone more to blow hitters away with his premium velocity and plus spin.

    His main out pitch is a devastating forkball splitter, which has plus plus depth due to Senga’s innate ability to neutralize spin with how he grips the ball. Senga’s been working on a cutter in recent years, which has jumped up in velocity as well. It sits in the high 80s with average bite, but plays up by keeping hitters off his fastball and vice versa. His fourth pitch is an average slider with inconsistent shape and location that flashes above average. 

    Senga has top of the rotation upside, and would easily earn a nine-figure deal if he were posted this offseason. Unfortunately, SoftBank is one of the more intransigent teams when it comes to posting their players. Barring a drastic change of institutional practice, it seems that MLB franchises will have to wait until Senga is eligible for international free agency in 2022.

    Kodai Senga W L IP ERA WHIP HR/9 K% BB%
    2019 13 8 180.1 2.79 1.16 0.9 30.6% 10.3%
    Career 55 29 733.1 2.77 1.12 0.9 28.4% 9.4%

    Tomoyuki Sugano, RHP, Yomiuri Giants

    Age: 29 | Free Agency Eligibility: 2022 | Posting Eligible?: Yes

    When consistency meets excellence in the NPB, it produces a pitcher like Tomoyuki Sugano. From 2014-2018, Sugano never had a season with an ERA lower than 2.33 or less than 150 innings pitched, and did it all for the Yomiuri Giants– the flagship franchise of the NPB. However, in 2019 Sugano has taken a step back. His ERA is a career high 3.89, he’s on pace to pitch fewer than 150 innings, and he’s averaging 1.3 homers per nine–more than double his career rate. 

    Sugano works off a fastball that sits 90-92 and tops out at 94 MPH. In later looks his fastball was sitting 89-91, but he still generates strong armside run and gets good sink on his two seamer. It’s lively enough to be an average pitch at present, though he has lost a tick on his heater and can’t really afford to lose any more velocity. His bread and butter is mixing that fastball with a pair of slider variations, both plus.

    The harder slider, which is classified as a cutter in some reports, has a nice tight hook and sharp gloveside bite. The more traditional slider has a more vertical hook that Sugano is able to finish down with regularly. He’ll mix in a hard forkball splitter that flashes plus depth, but the lack of consistent feel keeps it from projecting any more than an average pitch at the major league level.

    Like Senga, you can pretty much bank on Sugano not coming over to the majors until 2022. Yomiuri has made it very clear that they do not intend to post their players under the current posting agreement between MLB and NPB. That’s a shame, because Sugano still profiles as a No. 4 starter for an MLB team at present. But three years is a ways away, and any further loss of fastball velocity–particularly because of its correlation with an increased home run rate–could quell Sugano’s market abroad by the time he is eligible to negotiate with major league teams.

    Tomoyuki Sugano W L IP ERA WHIP HR/9 K% BB%
    2019 11 6 136.1 3.89 1.25 1.3 20.8% 5.9%
    Career 87 47 1222.2 2.36 1.05 0.6 22.1% 5.1%

    Takahiro Norimoto, RHP, Rakuten Golden Eagles

    Age: 28 | Free Agency Eligibility: 2026 | Posting Eligible?: Yes

    If Senga’s strength is elite stuff, and Sugano’s strength is elite performance, Takahiro Norimoto strength is the blend of both. Rakuten’s ace has been stellar in his seven year career, posting a 3.06 ERA with a 25.3% K rate and a miniscule 6.1% BB rate in nearly 1200 career innings. Unfortunately, Norimoto’s season was delayed by offseason surgery to clean up his pitching elbow, which has limited his starts in 2019. The good news is that he’s been quite good in limited action since returning from the injured list, posting an ERA around 3 and showing the same level of stuff he had pre-injury.

    Norimoto works off a fastball that will sit in the 92-94 MPH range and touch 96. He exhibits very good rise on it, and does a good job hiding it in his delivery to give it the “sneaky hop” that makes hitters late on it. He’ll generally follow up with a variety of three secondary pitches–a slider, a cutter and a splitter.

    The slider and cutter will bleed into each other in terms of shape and velocity, and will often get classified together as one pitch. The cutter has more lateral bite and break than the slider. Flashes plus when he commands it glove side, but it will leak towards the middle. The slider grades out as plus, due to its plus downward break and Norimoto’s ability to command it to both sides of the plate. The splitter flashes plus when Norimoto can get it to dive from the middle of the plate, but inconsistent feel will cause it to spike or hang and keeps it from being plus. A curve and a straight change, both confidently used as change of pace pitches, round out his arsenal.

    It was reported during the summer that Norimoto signed a seven-year extension with Rakuten prior to the 2019 season. If Rakuten chooses not to post Norimoto over the next seven years, he won’t be heading to the majors until his age 36 season. However, given Norimoto’s previously stated desire to be posted, it has been speculated that perhaps Norimoto is still interested in a move to the majors, and sought this extension as a form of insurance. Norimoto at present projects as a No. 3 starter in a major league rotation, with No. 2 upside if he continues to demonstrate the stuff and command he has shown since returning from injury over a larger sample of time. 

    Takahiro Norimoto W L IP ERA WHIP HR/9 K% BB%
    2019 7 5 83.0 2.49 0.98 0.9 24.5% 4.0%
    Career 82 63 1211.1 3.02 1.14 0.7 25.3% 6.2%

    Yudai Ono, LHP, Chunichi Dragons

    Age: 30 | Free Agency Eligibility: 2021 | Posting Eligible? Yes

    The longtime rock of the Dragons’ staff, Yudai Ono has been breathing fire in 2019. On the strength of a subtle increase in fastball velocity, Ono set a career high mark in strikeout rate while also cutting his walk rate down a half percent from career norms. This has helped him post a sparkling 2.63 ERA in over 174 innings pitched in the 2019 regular season. 

    Ono works primarily off a three pitch mix–fastball, splitter, slider. He’ll also mix in a get me over curveball once or twice a start, but those three pitches are what you need to prepare for when you step into the box. The fastball sits at 90 to 93 MPH, and will touch 94. It’s an average pitch with good rise that plays up a half grade due to Ono’s short arm action that hides the ball behind his head and makes batter late on it.

    The splitter is the better of his two secondaries, an out pitch against righties and a weak contact generator against lefties. It’s a hard offering, but the above average fade and depth makes it work despite the lack of velocity separation from the fastball. The slider is a high 70s slurvy offering that’s average at best, but still useful. It will get some whiffs from lefties early on, but the general goal of the pitch is to get hitters out in front and roll over on it, which Ono executes by consistently placing it over the outer edge of the zone. Occasionally a slider or splitter will leak out over the middle, or a fastball doesn’t get high enough. But as a whole, he generally commands all three pitches well to their spots and misses barrels when he does give up contact.

    Ono is not an international free agent until 2021, and it’s not clear if Chunichi is willing to post him, or if he is even interested in being posted. In years past, teams would have a hard time projecting Ono to pitch in anything greater than a relief role. He doesn’t have a very deep arsenal and lacks a plus pitch, making it hard to see him having success against MLB batters when he faces them a third time.

    However, with the advent of the opener strategy, pitchers with a similar profile have had success as the “longman”. I think Ono has enough command and deception to work in this role, where he can avoid having to face batters three times in a game.

    Yudai Ono W L IP ERA WHIP HR/9 K% BB%
    2019 9 8 174.1 2.63 1.00 0.9 22.2% 6.6%
    Career 58 61 1046.1 3.25 1.20 0.8 18.6% 7.1%

    Pierce Johnson, RHP, Hanshin Tigers

    Age: 28 | Free Agency Eligibility: 2020 | Posting Eligible? N/A

    This strays mostly from my focus of domestic players, but outside of catcher Ryutaro Umeno there really aren’t any superlative natives on Hanshin’s roster. Johnson has put up eye-popping numbers in his first year in the NPB; among pitchers with a minimum of 50 innings pitched, he leads the league in ERA (1.43), FIP (1.52) and K-BB% (33.8). His stuff isn’t too much different than his stints in Chicago and San Fran; the curve is a little harder and the fastball lost a half tick or so. What is different is his pitch mix.

     Johnson has completely scrapped his cutter in favor of throwing more curveballs, going 50/50 with his fastball and curve. Sure enough, the curve was by far the most effective offering he had as a major leaguer–he had a .225 xwOBA against on his breaker, compared to a .312 xwOBA on the cutter and a .355 xwOBA on the fastball. He also had an average spin rate of 2946 RPM on that curveball, which was 6th among pitchers with at least 200 curveballs thrown from 2017-2018. This kind of overhaul in approach isn’t uncommon in the majors, and if you close your eyes and picture a pitcher scrapping a secondary fastball for a four seam+curve mix you’d probably visualize an Astros cap on his head. 

    What’s most fascinating isn’t that this happened, but where it happened. NPB teams are certainly more aware of analytical concepts like infield shifting and lineup construction than ever before, but this is the most prominent example in the NPB of a pitcher overhauling his repertoire to pitch off of his best pitch–even if it’s a curveball.

    Johnson, who’s on a one year deal for Hanshin making the equivalent of about $800,000, has made the adjustments that we’ve seen in so many breakouts in the States. However, he didn’t have to toil in the high minors to do it, and has at the very least a multi-million dollar market for his services in Japan. 

    Pierce Johnson G IP ERA WHIP HR/9 K% BB%
    2019 (NPB) 55 55.2 1.43 0.83 0.3 39.4 6.1
    Career (MLB) 38 44.2 5.44 1.41 1.0 19.7% 12.4%

     

  • Evaluating NFL Defenses by Expected Points

    By Robert Simpson

    What Are Expected Points?

    The concept of expected points is not a new one, as it was first developed in the 1970s. Yet, this statistical abstraction had largely been forgotten until recently, when analytics began to permeate the world of football.

    Expected points metrics use historical data to find the average number of points a team is likely to score on any given drive based on down and distance. It is founded on two basic football principles: as a team gets closer to the goal line, its chances of scoring improve, while a team’s likelihood of scoring decreases on later downs. Expected points can also be negative. This indicates that a team is more likely to turn the ball over to its opponent with favorable field position than to score themselves.

    Not All Yards are Created Equal

    Traditionally, defenses are valued by three key statistics: yards allowed, points allowed, and turnovers. Although it is true that the more yards given up on a drive, the more likely an opponent is to score, yards in some parts of the field are worth more than others. If a defense were to give up 15 yards from their opponent’s 25-yard line, the opponent would still be far outside of field goal range, and their chances of scoring would not have substantially increased. However, if the defense had given up those same 15 yards from their own 45-yard line, the opponent would be at the 30-yard line, where the drive will almost certainly end in at least a field goal. In both situations, the defense gave up 15 yards, but in the second scenario, those yards were much more valuable.

    Points surrendered also has some shortcomings. While the objective of a defense is to prevent the opponent from scoring, some points allowed are not the fault of the defense. When an offense throws a pick six or commits a safety, it unfairly counts against said team’s defense. Special teams touchdowns surrendered can also unjustly affect the perception of a team’s defense in an adverse manner. The same can be said for field goals, where if a kicker misses an attempt, the defense is credited with zero points allowed on the drive, even though they may not have affected the kick.

    Turnovers are a very important part of the game, but they too fail to grasp the complete picture of a defense. While it is registered that a player makes an interception, it is important to evaluate where the interception takes place and to where it is returned. Defenses often do not get credit for long returns or even defensive scores. While all three of these stats combined can paint a good picture of a defense, there are many shortcomings that can only be overcome with the use of a new measurement.

    Expected Points Allowed per Drive

    Using Expected Points we can ask a very basic question of the defense, “How much better off is the offense at the end of the drive than the beginning?” Simply put, it measures the difference between expected points at the end of the drive and the beginning. 

    For example: if a team started their drive 1st and 10 at their own 25-yard line, it would have .635 expected points on the first play of the drive. If it were to end that drive on the opponent’s 34-yard line they would have 1.07 expected points at the culmination of the drive. Thus, over the course of the drive the defense would have surrendered .432 expected points or 1.07 ending expected points minus .635 starting expected points. Using this concept to chart the average results over the course of the season, one arrives at the statistic: Expected Points Allowed per Drive (EPA/D).

    Using this approach purposely excludes what happens on the final play of the drive so as not to include results over which the defense does not have control (i.e. punt yardage or field goal accuracy). Thus, there are a few adjustments that must be made for results over which the defense has control, namely touchdowns, safeties, and turnovers. 

    If the offense scored a touchdown, the ending expected points would be 6.95, because in 2018 teams converted extra points 95% of the time while defensive touchdowns would be -6.95. Thus, the EPA/D for a touchdown scored would be 6.95 minus the starting expected points. If the offense commits a safety on the drive, the ending expected points would be -2, because there were two points scored against them. For field goals, the EPA/D calculation does not change, as the defense does not control the success rate of the kick. 

    If a non-scoring turnover occurs, the ending expected points is charted as the negative starting expected points on the next drive. This method for turnovers is applied because the defense not only allowed zero points on the drive, they also increased their offense’s chances of scoring on the subsequent drive.

    Re-Ranking NFL Defenses

    The chart below ranks every NFL team’s defense for the 2018 season based on the EPA/D metric, juxtaposed by three common stats used to rate defenses: yards per game, points per game, and turnovers per game. While most teams rank about where expected, there are some exceptions discussed below.

    Team EPA/D Rank EPA/D YPG Rank PPG Rank TO Rank
    Chicago Bears 1 -0.298 3 1 1
    Baltimore Ravens 2 -0.040 1 2 22
    Minnesota Vikings 3 -0.038 4 9 16
    Buffalo Bills 4 0.063 2 18 8
    Houston Texans 5 0.080 12 5 4
    New England Patriots 6 0.181 21 7 5
    Tennessee Titans 7 0.257 8 3 23
    Jacksonville Jaguars 8 0.274 5 4 24
    Dallas Cowboys 9 0.280 7 6 18
    Los Angeles Chargers 10 0.284 9 8 17
    Indianapolis Colts 11 0.298 11 10 10
    Los Angeles Rams 12 0.377 19 20 3
    Cleveland Browns 13 0.408 30 21 2
    Denver Broncos 14 0.410 22 12 6
    Pittsburgh Steelers 15 0.410 6 16 29
    New York Jets 16 0.433 25 29 19
    Seattle Seahawks 17 0.453 16 11 11
    Arizona Cardinals 18 0.488 20 26 28
    Philadelphia Eagles 19 0.556 23 13 25
    Green Bay Packers 20 0.633 18 22 30
    New Orleans Saints 21 0.659 14 14 13
    Detroit Lions 22 0.680 10 17 31
    Washington Redskins 23 0.695 17 15 12
    Carolina Panthers 24 0.697 15 19 14
    San Francisco 49ers 25 0.718 13 28 32
    New York Giants 26 0.794 24 23 15
    Miami Dolphins 27 0.874 29 27 7
    Tampa Bay Buccaneers 28 0.904 27 31 26
    Cincinnati Bengals 29 0.964 32 30 21
    Kansas City Chiefs 30 1.014 31 24 9
    Atlanta Falcons 31 1.041 28 25 20
    Oakland Raiders 32 1.071 26 32 27

     

    For the most part, teams who did well in at least two of the three traditional rankings are towards the top of the EPA/D ranking. Teams who ranked low in at least two of the three areas were towards the bottom.

    One team whose placement on this list may raise some eyebrows is the Buffalo Bills. One might ask how a team that gave up so few yards and forced so many turnovers could possibly give up so many points. The answer to this question is field position. Buffalo ranked dead last in the league in opponent’s starting field position. The Bills’ opponents started drives from their own 32-yard line on average, while the Texans’ opponents started on average from their own 25-yard line, the best mark in the league.

    This 7-yard difference may not seem significant, but over the course of the season, it very much is. The difference in expected points from starting at your own 25 to starting at the 32 is about .4 expected points. Last year, Buffalo’s defense faced 187 opposing drives. Multiply these drives by .4 expected points, and these 7 yards add up to 74.8 expected points over the course of the season, or 4.7 points per game. If you subtract 4.7 points per game from their defensive total, it would move them from the 18th ranked defense in PPG to 3rd. Josh Allen’s inconsistency at the helm of the offense played a major factor in the Bills losing the field position battle. As Allen gains experience in year two, this field position deficiency may improve.

    The Cleveland Browns are another team that sticks out. While their yards per game were almost dead last in the league and their points per game also ranked near the bottom, they were elite when it came to forcing turnovers. In 2018, the Browns’ defense forced 31 turnovers, 10

    more than the league’s average, creating a turnover on over 16% of opponents’ drives. Cleveland was also 25th in the league in opponent’s starting expected points.

     Like the Bills, this was fueled by inconsistent play at quarterback, with Tyrod Taylor eventually giving up the reigns to rookie Baker Mayfield. The elite turnover rate and high opponents’ starting expected points helped the Browns overcome their lackluster performance in other areas.

    A team that ranks lower than expected is the New Orleans Saints. With rankings of 14 in YPG, 14 in PPG, and 13 in TOPG, it seems like a ranking of 21 is far too low. The reason for this low ranking is that the Saints’ defense had the fewest drives faced in the league at 164. The league average for drives faced in 2018 was 179, so the Saints may have ranked No. 13 in yards given up, but that was accumulated over 15 fewer drives. Per drive, their defense was worse than these traditional measurements may suggest. 

    The minimal amount of opponent drives is likely due to the Saint’s prolific offense, which can eat up a lot of clock with elite back Alvin Kamara and future Hall of Fame quarterback Drew Brees. The Saints also ranked third in the league in opponent starting field position, so when they gave up big plays, it counted more heavily against them. The Panthers and Redskins were in a similar situation, both near the bottom of opponent drives and high on opponent’s starting field position.

    Conclusion

    Expected Points Allowed per Drive is superior to traditional defensive measurements, as it takes into consideration factors such as field position and number of opponent drives. EPA/D gives defenses proper credit for their actions and does not penalize them for factors beyond their control. EPA/D can be used to more accurately rate defenses, especially those put in bad positions by their offense.